Salquil Rivera, et al. v. Garland
JOSE CRUZ SALQUIL RIVERA and JOSE ALBERTO SALQUIL TUMAX |
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
22-1898 |
November 18, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 ORDER FILED. Respondent's unopposed motion to remand this matter to the Board of Immigration Appeals (Docket Entry No. 21) is granted. Petitioners removal is stayed pending a Board decision in this matter. As stated in the unopposed motion, the parties shall bear their own fees and costs. This order served on the agency shall act as the mandate of this court. REMANDED. [Entered: 06/08/2023 02:29 PM] |
Filing 21 MOTION to remand case filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 05/30/2023 06:53 AM] |
Filing 20 ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Answering Brief for 30 days (DE 19) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Answering Brief Due 6/23/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 05/18/2023 11:03 AM] |
Filing 19 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file answering brief for 30 days filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 05/18/2023 09:59 AM] |
Filing 18 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Respondent Kristin Moresi representing Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 04/13/2023 11:16 AM] |
Filing 17 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Victor Matthew Lawrence for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 04/13/2023 11:15 AM] |
Filing 16 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Victor Matthew Lawrence for Respondent Merrick B. Garland replacing Kristin Moresi. [Entered: 04/13/2023 11:06 AM] |
Filing 15 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 13 by Petitioners Jose Cruz Salquil Rivera and Jose Alberto Salquil Tumax received. [Entered: 03/30/2023 03:01 PM] |
Filing 14 ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 13 by Petitioners Jose Cruz Salquil Rivera and Jose Alberto Salquil Tumax is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioners must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 03/24/2023 08:50 AM] |
Filing 13 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Jose Cruz Salquil Rivera, Petitioner Jose Alberto Salquil Tumax. [Entered: 03/23/2023 12:37 PM] |
Filing 12 ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief for 30 days (DE 11) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Petitioner Opening Brief due 3/23/2023, Respondent Answering Brief due 5/24/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 02/16/2023 10:20 AM] |
Filing 11 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file opening brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Jose Cruz Salquil Rivera, Petitioner Jose Alberto Salquil Tumax. [Entered: 02/15/2023 02:52 PM] |
Filing 10 ORDER FILED. The government has filed a statement of non-opposition to the motion for stay of removal. The temporary stay of removal continues until the mandate issues unless the court orders otherwise.See 9th Cir. Gen. Ord. 6.4(c). [Entered: 01/10/2023 11:02 AM] |
Filing 9 STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 01/10/2023 09:50 AM] |
Filing 8 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Kristin Moresi for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 12/05/2022 04:20 PM] |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Kristin Moresi for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 12/05/2022 02:01 PM] |
Filing 6 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office Of Immigration Review. [Entered: 12/02/2022 08:00 AM] |
Filing 5 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 12/23/2022, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 1/13/2023, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due 2/21/2023, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 4/24/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 11/18/2022 02:27 PM] |
Filing 4 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 11/18/2022. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 22-1898 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 11/18/2022 02:25 PM] |
Filing 3 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 10/28/2022. [Entered: 11/18/2022 02:24 PM] |
Filing 2 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 11/18/2022 02:24 PM] |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 11/18/2022 02:24 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.