Marquez v. Garland
Petitioner: MARIA MARQUEZ, J. M. G.-M. and N. B. G.-M.
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Case Number: 22-1936
Filed: November 28, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER FILED. This petition was dismissed on February 22, 2023, because petitioners did not respond to the courts January 11, 2023, order directing them to file a response showing that the petition was timely. Petitioners may file a motion to reinstate the petition which includes a response to the courts January 11, 2023, order. If such a motion is filed within 21 days of this order, the court will consider the motion to reinstate. If such a motion is not filed within 21 days of this order, the mandate will become effective. The Clerk will serve a copy of the courts January 11, 2023, order on petitioners. The court takes no action on petitioners motion for an extension to file the opening brief (Docket Entry No. 14). [Entered: 05/11/2023 01:35 PM]
March 2, 2023 Filing 14 MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Maria Marquez. [Entered: 03/03/2023 03:30 PM]
February 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER FILED. The court issued an order on January 11, 2023, directing petitioners to file a response within 28 days showing that the petition was timely received. To date, petitioners have not responded. This petition for review is therefore dismissed for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. This order will be served on the agency and will become the mandate of the court in 21 days. [Entered: 02/22/2023 09:11 AM]
January 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER FILED. A petition for review must be filed within 30 days of the final order of removal. See 8 U.S.C. 1252(b)(1); Martinez v. Sessions, 873 F.3d 655, 658 (9th Cir. 2017) (as amended). It appears this petition was filed more than 30 days after the October 13, 2022, order of removal. See Sheviakov v. INS, 237 F.3d 1144, 1147-48 (9th Cir. 2001) (petition deemed filed when received by court). To proceed in this court, petitioners must file a response within 28 days of this order showing that the petition was timely received. If petitioners do not respond, the petition will be dismissed. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If petitioners do respond, the government may file a reply within 10 days after service of the response. The briefing schedule is stayed. [Entered: 01/11/2023 11:20 AM]
January 10, 2023 Filing 11 ADDED Petitioner J. M. G.-M., Petitioner N. B. G.-M.. [Entered: 01/10/2023 04:51 PM]
January 9, 2023 Filing 10 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Andrew Nathan O'Malley for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 01/09/2023 11:51 AM]
January 8, 2023 Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Andrew Nathan O'Malley for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 01/08/2023 04:55 AM]
January 4, 2023 Filing 8 STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 01/04/2023 06:20 PM]
December 14, 2022 Filing 7 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Micah Engler for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 12/14/2022 02:20 PM]
December 14, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Micah Engler for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 12/14/2022 01:07 PM]
December 8, 2022 Filing 5 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office Of Immigration Review. [Entered: 12/08/2022 06:29 AM]
November 28, 2022 Filing 4 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 1/2/2023, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 1/23/2023, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due 3/3/2023, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 5/2/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 11/28/2022 03:26 PM]
November 28, 2022 Filing 3 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 11/28/2022. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 22-1936 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 11/28/2022 03:22 PM]
November 28, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 11/28/2022 03:20 PM]
November 28, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 11/28/2022 03:20 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Marquez v. Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: MARIA MARQUEZ
Represented By: Maria Marquez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: J. M. G.-M.
Represented By: J. M. G.-M
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: N. B. G.-M.
Represented By: N. B. G.-M
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: OIL
Represented By: Mr. Andrew Nathan O'Malley
Represented By: Mr. Micah Engler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?