Harrison v. Bludworth
| JASON ROBERT HARRISON |
| PETE BLUDWORTH, WARDEN |
| 22-2014 |
| December 14, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 DOCUMENT SENT. Sent Appellant a copy of Form 12 in response to the 04/18/2023 filing. [Entered: 04/26/2023 10:26 AM] |
| Filing 7 Miscellaneous Pro Se Filings Filed [Entered: 04/19/2023 02:55 PM] |
Filing 6
ORDER FILED. The courts February 17, 2023, order transferred the application for authorization to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C. 2254 habeas petition to the district court to be docketed as a notice of appeal from the November 30, 2022, judgment entered in United States District Court for the District of Montana case no. 6:21-cv-00056-DLC-KLD. The applicant subsequently filed at Docket Entry No. 5 a habeas corpus petition. The applicant is informed that the courts February 17, 2023 order stated: No further filings will be entertained in this case. The court, therefore, will not take any action on the applicants filing. [Entered: 03/21/2023 03:19 PM]
|
| Filing 5 CORRESPONDENCE filed by Petitioner Jason Robert Harrison. Deficiencies: case closed, no further filings per 2/17/2023 order. (Sent petitioner copy of 2/17/2023 order and docket sheet.) [Entered: 03/01/2023 09:23 AM] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER FILED. Ferdinand F. FERNANDEZ, Michelle T. FRIEDLAND, Holly A. THOMAS The application for authorization to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C. 2254 habeas corpus petition does not seek authorization under 28 U.S.C. 2244(b) and instead manifests an intent to appeal from the district courts judgment, entered on November 30, 2022, in United States District Court for the District of Montana case no. 6:21-cv-00056-DLC-KLD. Accordingly, the application is treated as a notice of appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1); Smith v. Barry, 502 U.S. 244, 248-49 (1992) (If a document filed within the time specified by Rule 4 gives the notice required by Rule 3, it is effective as a notice of appeal.). The Clerk will transfer the application to the United States District Court for the District of Montana for docketing as a notice of appeal. The notice of appeal is deemed filed in the district court on December 5, 2022. See Fed. R. App. P. 4 (d); Butler v. Long, 752 F.3d 1177, 1178 n.1 (9th Cir. 2014) (assuming petitioner turned his petition over to prison authorities on the day it was signed and applying the mailbox rule). The Clerk will serve this order directly on the chambers of the Honorable Dana L. Christensen and the Honorable Kathleen L. DeSoto. Upon transmittal of the application to the district court, the Clerk will close this action. Any pending motions are denied as moot. No further filings will be entertained in this case. APPLICATION TRANSFERRED. [Entered: 02/17/2023 01:44 PM] [Edited: 02/17/2023 05:30 PM]
|
| Filing 3 SOS DOCKETING NOTICE. Application for Permission to File a Second or Successive Habeas Corpus Petition has been opened and assigned the Ninth Circuit case number 22-2014. All subsequent correspondence regarding this matter will be added to your file to be considered at the same time the cause is brought before the court. The case number and the title of your case should be shown in the upper right corner of any correspondence to the clerk's office, and should be directed to the above address pursuant to Circuit Rule 25-1. [Entered: 12/14/2022 10:49 AM] |
| Filing 2 CASE OPENED. Application for Leave to File Second or Successive 2254 Petition has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 12/13/2022. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 22-2014 has been assigned to this case. [Entered: 12/14/2022 10:47 AM] |
| Filing 1 Application for Leave to File 28 U.S.C. 2254 Second or Successive Petition. [Entered: 12/14/2022 10:44 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Harrison v. Bludworth | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: JASON ROBERT HARRISON | |
| Represented By: | Jason Robert Harrison |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: PETE BLUDWORTH, WARDEN | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
