Dominguez Vidal v. Garland
| RAYMUNDO NOE DOMINGUEZ VIDAL |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 22-2063 |
| December 22, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 MAIL RETURNED. DE 20 addressed to Petitioner Raymundo Noe Dominguez Vidal. Action taken: governments counsel directed to forward to last known address (see attached notice). [Entered: 08/23/2023 11:38 AM] |
Filing 20
ORDER FILED. Petitioner has failed to file the opening brief in this case. Pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1, this case is dismissed for failure to prosecute. This order will be served on the agency and will become the mandate of the court in 21 days. [Entered: 08/08/2023 04:25 PM]
|
| Filing 19 MAIL RETURNED. Resending to: government's counsel, Katie Elizabeth Rourke, for forwarding. [Entered: 04/20/2023 04:48 PM] |
| Filing 18 MAIL RETURNED. Resending to: government's counsel, Katie Elizabeth Rourke, for forwarding. [Entered: 04/17/2023 11:11 AM] |
|
Filing 17
ORDER FILED. Petitioners renewed motion for a stay of removal (Docket Entry No. 14) is denied, effective April 10, 2023, at 5:00 p.m. No further motions for a stay of removal will be entertained in this case. [Entered: 04/10/2023 01:52 PM]
|
| Filing 16 OPPOSITION TO RENEWED MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 04/10/2023 08:11 AM] |
|
Filing 15
ORDER FILED. S.R. THOMAS and KOH, Circuit Judges. The court has received petitioners renewed motion for stay of removal (Docket Entry No. 14). Petitioners removal is stayed until Monday, April 10, 2023, at 5:00 p.m. PST to allow the court time to review the merits of the motion. [Entered: 04/07/2023 05:17 PM]
|
| Filing 14 RENEWED MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner Raymundo Noe Dominguez Vidal. [Entered: 04/07/2023 11:06 AM] |
|
Filing 13
ORDER FILED. Sidney R. THOMAS, Lucy H. KOH The court, in its discretion, denies the motion for appointment of pro bono counsel (Docket Entry No. 4). The supplemented motion for a stay of removal (Docket Entry Nos. 2, 12) is denied. See Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418 (2009); Leiva-Perez v. Holder, 640 F.3d 962 (9th Cir. 2011). The temporary stay of removal is lifted. If petitioner is removed or otherwise has a change of address, petitioner must notify this court of the new address. Otherwise, the petition may be dismissed. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The opening brief is due June 2, 2023. The answering brief is due August 1, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 04/05/2023 11:03 AM]
|
| Filing 12 SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner Raymundo Noe Dominguez Vidal. [Entered: 03/09/2023 03:40 PM] |
| Filing 11 OPPOSITION to motion to stay removal filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 01/31/2023 12:23 PM] |
| Filing 10 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office Of Immigration Review. [Entered: 01/12/2023 08:17 AM] |
|
Filing 9
ORDER FILED. Lisa B. Fitzgerald, Appellate Commissioner. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. 3) is granted. The Clerk will amend the docket to reflect this status. The certified administrative record remains due January 26, 2023. The response to the motion for a stay of removal remains due February 16, 2023. Briefing is stayed pending resolution of the motion for appointment of counsel. See 9th Cir. R. 27-11. [Entered: 01/06/2023 04:30 PM]
|
| Filing 8 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Katie Elizabeth Rourke for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 12/23/2022 08:22 AM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Katie Elizabeth Rourke for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 12/23/2022 06:46 AM] |
| Filing 6 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 1/26/2023, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 2/16/2023, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due 3/27/2023, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 5/26/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 12/22/2022 12:06 PM] |
| Filing 5 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 12/22/2022. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 22-2063 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 12/22/2022 12:04 PM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 12/22/2022 12:01 PM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 12/22/2022 12:01 PM] |
| Filing 2 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 12/22/2022 12:01 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 12/22/2022 12:01 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Dominguez Vidal v. Garland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: RAYMUNDO NOE DOMINGUEZ VIDAL | |
| Represented By: | Raymundo Noe Dominguez Vidal |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | OIL |
| Represented By: | Katie Elizabeth Rourke |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
