Vasquez Perez, et al. v. Garland
Petitioner: DANIA VASQUEZ PEREZ and JUAN DANIEL VASQUEZ PEREZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Case Number: 22-2094
Filed: December 30, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER FILED. Pursuant to the parties joint motion (Docket Entry No. 20), the Clerk will close this courts docket for administrative purposes until further order of the court. This order is not a decision on the merits and has no impact on any stay of removal. No mandate will issue, and at any time any party may request that this immigration petition be reopened, or the court may reopen the petition sua sponte. Within 14 days after a determination at the agency level that petitioner is eligible for discretionary relief, the parties are expected to file a motion to remand. The parties may request a referral to mediation at any time it might benefit the case. [Entered: 10/03/2023 09:57 AM]
September 26, 2023 Filing 20 MOTION to Administratively Close Case filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 09/26/2023 04:54 AM]
September 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER FILED. Petitioners unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 18) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due October 5, 2023. The answering brief is due December 4, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 09/07/2023 04:51 PM]
September 5, 2023 Filing 18 MOTION to Extend Time to File Opening Brief filed by Petitioner Dania Vasquez Perez, Petitioner Juan Daniel Vasquez Perez. [Entered: 09/05/2023 02:24 PM]
June 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER FILED. Petitioners unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 16) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due September 5, 2023. The answering brief is due November 6, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 06/30/2023 03:25 PM]
June 29, 2023 Filing 16 MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Dania Vasquez Perez, Petitioner Juan Daniel Vasquez Perez. [Entered: 06/29/2023 03:52 PM]
May 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER FILED. Petitioners unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 14) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due July 3, 2023. The answering brief is due September 1, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 05/04/2023 04:50 PM]
May 4, 2023 Filing 14 MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Dania Vasquez Perez, Petitioner Juan Daniel Vasquez Perez. [Entered: 05/04/2023 12:38 PM]
April 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief for 30 days (DE 12) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Opening Brief Due 5/4/2023, Answering Brief Due 7/3/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 04/04/2023 02:41 PM]
April 4, 2023 Filing 12 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file opening brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Dania Vasquez Perez, Petitioner Juan Daniel Vasquez Perez. [Entered: 04/04/2023 01:29 PM]
February 24, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER FILED. The government has filed a statement of non-opposition to the motion for stay of removal. The temporary stay of removal continues until the mandate issues unless the court orders otherwise. See 9th Cir. Gen. Ord. 6.4(c). [Entered: 02/24/2023 02:41 PM]
February 24, 2023 Filing 10 STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 02/24/2023 10:38 AM]
January 13, 2023 Filing 9 SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner Dania Vasquez Perez, Petitioner Juan Daniel Vasquez Perez. [Entered: 01/13/2023 11:11 PM]
January 11, 2023 Filing 8 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office Of Immigration Review. [Entered: 01/11/2023 05:10 AM]
January 4, 2023 Filing 7 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Sanya Sarich Kerksiek for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 01/04/2023 08:45 AM]
January 4, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Sanya Sarich Kerksiek for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 01/04/2023 06:55 AM]
December 30, 2022 Filing 5 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 2/3/2023, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 2/24/2023, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due 4/4/2023, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 6/5/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 12/30/2022 03:05 PM]
December 30, 2022 Filing 4 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 12/30/2022 03:02 PM]
December 30, 2022 Filing 3 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 12/30/2022. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 22-2094 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 12/30/2022 03:01 PM]
December 30, 2022 Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 11/30/2022. [Entered: 12/30/2022 03:00 PM]
December 30, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 12/30/2022 03:00 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Vasquez Perez, et al. v. Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: DANIA VASQUEZ PEREZ
Represented By: Mr. Manuel Q. Diones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: JUAN DANIEL VASQUEZ PEREZ
Represented By: Mr. Manuel Q. Diones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: Oil
Represented By: Sanya Sarich Kerksiek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?