James Hurst v. Garland
| JESSE JAMES HURST |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 22-25 |
| January 6, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ORDER FILED. Pursuant to respondents unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 16), the Clerk will close this courts docket for administrative purposes until further order of the court. This order is not a decision on the merits and has no impact on any stay of removal. No mandate will issue, and at any time any party may request that this immigration petition be reopened, or the court may reopen the petition sua sponte. Within 14 days after a determination at the agency level that petitioner is eligible for discretionary relief, the parties are expected to file a motion to remand. The parties may request a referral to mediation at any time it might benefit the case. [Entered: 06/23/2022 04:23:00 PM]
|
| Filing 16 MOTION to administratively close case filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 06/22/2022 01:06:00 PM] |
| Filing 15 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 13 by Petitioner Jesse James Hurst received. [Entered: 05/13/2022 04:10:00 PM] |
|
Filing 14
ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 13 by Petitioner Jesse James Hurst is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioner must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 05/10/2022 01:39:00 PM]
|
| Filing 13 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Jesse James Hurst. [Entered: 05/10/2022 12:37:00 PM] |
|
Filing 12
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief for 30 days (DE 11) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Petitioner Opening Brief due 5/11/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 7/11/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 04/07/2022 03:27:00 PM]
|
| Filing 11 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file opening brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Jesse James Hurst. [Entered: 04/06/2022 07:13:00 PM] |
|
Filing 10
ORDER FILED. Motion to Stay Removal (DE 2) not opposed. [Entered: 02/23/2022 03:37:00 PM]
|
| Filing 9 STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 02/23/2022 08:22:00 AM] |
| Filing 8 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed. [Entered: 02/08/2022 09:43:00 AM] |
| Filing 7 ADDED Todd J. Cochran for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 01/06/2022 09:35:00 AM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Todd J. Cochran for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 01/06/2022 09:02:00 AM] |
| Filing 5 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 2/10/2022, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 3/3/2022, Petitioner Opening Brief due 4/11/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 6/10/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 01/06/2022 08:48:00 AM] |
| Filing 4 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 1/5/2022. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 22-25 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 01/06/2022 08:45:00 AM] |
| Filing 3 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 12/14/2021. [Entered: 01/05/2022 06:51:00 PM] |
| Filing 2 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 01/05/2022 06:50:00 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 01/05/2022 06:49:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: James Hurst v. Garland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: JESSE JAMES HURST | |
| Represented By: | Mr. Nikhil M. Shah |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | OIL |
| Represented By: | Todd J. Cochran |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
