Vasquez Fajardo v. Garland
| FRANCISCO VASQUEZ FAJARDO |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 22-32 |
| January 6, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER FILED. The court issued orders on January 10, 2022, and February 9, 2022, directing petitioner to file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee. To date, petitioner has done neither. This petition for review is therefore dismissed for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. This order will be served on the agency and will become the mandate of the court in 21 days. [Entered: 04/05/2022 10:30:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER FILED. Filing Fees Due. [Entered: 02/09/2022 02:52:00 PM]
|
| Filing 7 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed. [Entered: 02/09/2022 12:40:00 PM] |
| Filing 6 ADDED Kristen A. Giuffreda for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 01/20/2022 12:25:00 PM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Kristen A. Giuffreda for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 01/20/2022 11:08:00 AM] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER FILED. Filing Fees Due. [Entered: 01/10/2022 05:47:00 PM] [Edited: 01/10/2022 05:59:00 PM]
|
| Filing 3 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 2/10/2022, Petitioner Opening Brief due 4/11/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 6/10/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 01/06/2022 01:55:00 PM] |
| Filing 2 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 1/6/2022. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 22-32 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 01/06/2022 01:46:00 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 01/06/2022 01:10:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Vasquez Fajardo v. Garland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: FRANCISCO VASQUEZ FAJARDO | |
| Represented By: | Francisco Vasquez Fajardo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | Kristen A. Giuffreda |
| Represented By: | OIL |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
