Albert Zuniga v. King County, et al
ALBERT B. ZUNIGA, Zombie Tech Corporation |
KING COUNTY, CITY OF SEATTLE, JENNY ANNE DURKAN, DOW CONSTANTINE, KCCH, WELLS FARGO BANK, JESSE SEPULVEDA, Attorney, JIM GRONA, Grona Builders, TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY, MARK MANNING, Duns & Bradstreet, UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM, VETERANS AFFAIRS HOSPITAL, USAA INS. CO., ROBERT C. SCHENK, MD, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, Pentagon, DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNIVERSITY HEALTH SERVICES CENTER, LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS, GOOGLE, BOEING AIRCRAFT CO., GODADDY INC., NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, Pentagon |
22-35009 |
January 6, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 Filed Appellant Albert B. Zuniga motion to co-join appeal. Deficiencies: None. Served on 02/10/2022. [12375847] (DJV) [Entered: 02/22/2022 09:19 AM] |
Filing 18 Filed original and 0 copies of Appellant Albert B. Zuniga opening brief of 10 pages (Informal: Yes). Served via ECF on 02/18/2022. (Briefing remains stayed) [12375075] (KT) [Entered: 02/18/2022 03:04 PM] |
Filing 17 Filed Appellant Albert B. Zuniga letter dated 01/24/2022 re: exhibits to de 16. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12368775] (DJV) [Entered: 02/14/2022 07:17 AM] |
Filing 16 Filed Appellant Albert B. Zuniga motion for injunctive relief. Deficiencies: None. Served on 02/03/2022. [12367998] (DJV) [Entered: 02/11/2022 01:45 PM] |
Filing 15 Streamlined request by Appellant Albert B. Zuniga to extend time to file the brief is not approved because it is unnecessary. The briefing schedule is stayed per Clerk Order filed 1/14/022 Docket [4]. See 9th Cir. R. 27-11. [12351305] (DLM) [Entered: 01/25/2022 06:09 PM] |
Filing 14 Sent Appellant a copy of the docket sheet and the FRAP and Ninth Circuit rules and a copy of the docket sheet for 19-35831 in response to the Form 29 requet filed on 01/24/2022. [12349841] (JR) [Entered: 01/25/2022 08:44 AM] |
Filing 13 Filed Appellant Albert B. Zuniga motion miscellaneous request to consolidate all causes. Deficiencies: None. Served on 01/19/2022. [12349728] (DJV) [Entered: 01/25/2022 07:08 AM] |
Filing 12 Filed Appellant Albert B. Zuniga letter dated 12/13/2021 re: further consideration of denial of IFP status i.e. addendum to DE 9. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12349727] (DJV) [Entered: 01/25/2022 07:06 AM] |
Filing 11 Filed Appellant Albert B. Zuniga letter dated 01/19/2022 re: addendum to DE 10. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12349726] (DJV) [Entered: 01/25/2022 07:03 AM] |
Filing 10 Filed Appellant Albert B. Zuniga motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 01/19/2022. [12349725] (DJV) [Entered: 01/25/2022 07:01 AM] |
Filing 9 Filed Appellant Albert B. Zuniga response to court's order of 01/14/22. Served on 01/19/2022. [12349724] (DJV) [Entered: 01/25/2022 07:00 AM] |
Filing 8 Filed Appellant Albert B. Zuniga letter dated 01/19/2022 re: request for docket sheet & rules. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12349723] (DJV) [Entered: 01/25/2022 06:56 AM] |
Filing 7 Filed Appellant Albert B. Zuniga motion to appoint counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 01/19/2022. [12349722] (DJV) [Entered: 01/25/2022 06:54 AM] |
Filing 6 Filed Appellant Albert B. Zuniga motion to extend time to comply with the order. Deficiencies: None. Served on 01/19/2022. [12349721] (DJV) [Entered: 01/25/2022 06:53 AM] |
Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If the court dismisses the appeal as frivolous, this appeal may be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [12340789] (CKP) [Entered: 01/14/2022 12:28 AM] |
Filing 4 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 22-35009: Due] ). [12338412] (DJV) [Entered: 01/12/2022 09:33 AM] |
Filing 3 Received copy of District Court order filed on 01/10/2022 in forma pauperis revoked [12338410] (DJV) [Entered: 01/12/2022 09:32 AM] |
Filing 2 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [12333843] (CKP) [Entered: 01/07/2022 07:09 AM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT & NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Albert B. Zuniga opening brief due 02/25/2022. [12333059] (OC) [Entered: 01/06/2022 10:59 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.