Board of Trustees of the Autom v. Peninsula Truck Lines, Inc.
| BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE AUTOMOTIVE MACHINISTS PENSION TRUST |
| PENINSULA TRUCK LINES, INC. |
| 22-35025 |
| January 11, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Employee Retirement |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MEDIATION STATUS REPORT DUE - 03/16/2022. The briefing schedule previously set by the court is amended as follows :Appellant Peninsula Truck Lines, Inc. opening brief due 04/13/2022. Appellee Board of Trustees of the Automotive Machinists Pension Trust answering brief due 05/13/2022Appellants optional reply brief is due within twenty one 21 days from the service date of the answer brief. See order for details. [12384397] (LW) [Entered: 03/02/2022 01:41 PM] |
| Filing 5 MEDIATION CONFERENCE RESCHEDULED - DIAL IN Assessment Conference, 03/02/2022, 1:00 p.m. Pacific Time. (originally scheduled on 02/22/2022 ). [12358406] (LW) [Entered: 02/02/2022 10:14 AM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL IN AssessmentConference, 02/22/2022, 2:30 p.m., PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12351695] (LW) [Entered: 01/26/2022 10:38 AM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 01/18/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12344018]. [22-35025] (AD) [Entered: 01/18/2022 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Peninsula Truck Lines, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 01/18/2022. [12343177] [22-35025] (Roller, Jeremy) [Entered: 01/18/2022 01:23 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Peninsula Truck Lines, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire due on 01/18/2022. Appellant Peninsula Truck Lines, Inc. opening brief due 03/14/2022. Appellee Board of Trustees of the Automotive Machinists Pension Trust answering brief due 04/14/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12337858] (RT) [Entered: 01/11/2022 03:10 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Board of Trustees of the Autom v. Peninsula Truck Lines, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE AUTOMOTIVE MACHINISTS PENSION TRUST | |
| Represented By: | Douglas M. Lash |
| Represented By: | Les M. Coughran |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: PENINSULA TRUCK LINES, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Jeremy E. Roller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
