Robert James v. Eric Jackson
| ROBERT E. JAMES |
| ERIC JACKSON |
| 22-35041 |
| January 14, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Added Attorney(s) Andrew David Kennedy for party(s) Appellant Robert E. James, in case 22-35041. [12377117] (RR) [Entered: 02/22/2022 05:54 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed order (Appellate Commissioner): The court has determined that appointment of counsel would benefit the courts review in this appeal. See 18 U.S.C. 3006A(a)(2)(B); Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983). Counsel will be appointed by separate order. If appellant objects to appointment of counsel, he must notify the court in writing within 21 days of this order. The Clerk will electronically serve this order on the appointing authority for the Western District of Washington, who will locate appointed counsel. The appointing authority is requested to send notification of the name, address, and telephone number of appointed counsel to the Clerk of this court at counselappointments@ca9.uscourts.gov within 14 days of locating counsel. Appellants motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 3 ]) to extend time to file the opening brief is granted. Appellants opening brief and excerpts of record are due May 16, 2022; appellees answering brief is due June 15, 2022; and the optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. Appellants motion (Docket Entry No.[ # 2 ]) to expand the certificate of appealability to address uncertified issues is denied without prejudice. Counsel may include uncertified issues in the opening brief, which will be treated as a motion to expand the certificate of appealability and will be addressed by the merits panel to such extent as the panel deems appropriate. See 9th Cir. R. 22-1(e). [12373939] (WL) [Entered: 02/17/2022 04:36 PM] |
| Filing 4 Sent Appellant a copy of the FRAP and Ninth Circuit rules in response to DE 3 filed on 02/07/2022. [12373413] (JR) [Entered: 02/17/2022 12:45 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Robert E. James motion to extend time to file appellant opening brief Deficiencies: None. Served on. [12363781] (JFF) [Entered: 02/08/2022 10:53 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Robert E. James motion for certificate of appealability. Deficiencies: None. Served on. [12356297][Edited 01/31/2022 by JFF] (JFF) [Entered: 01/31/2022 03:03 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Robert E. James opening brief due 03/11/2022. Appellee Eric Jackson answering brief due 04/11/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12341443] (JMR) [Entered: 01/14/2022 01:34 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Robert James v. Eric Jackson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: ROBERT E. JAMES | |
| Represented By: | Robert E. James |
| Represented By: | Andrew David Kennedy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: ERIC JACKSON | |
| Represented By: | John Joseph Samson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
