Brenda Johnson v. County of Pierce, et al
| BRENDA M. JOHNSON |
| COUNTY OF PIERCE, OFFICER BARBRA MCINVAILLE and OFFICER BRYAN CHUSHCOFF |
| 22-35073 |
| January 27, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filed order (A. WALLACE TASHIMA, MICHELLE T. FRIEDLAND and BRIDGET S. BADE) Appellants motion for reconsideration of the Clerks January 28, 2022 order dismissing this appeal as duplicative of closed appeal No. 22-35002 (Docket Entry No. [ # 3 ]) is denied. See 9th Cir. R. 27-10. A review of the district courts docket reflects that appellant has not filed a new appeal of the district courts final judgment entered on February 28, 2022. No further filings will be entertained in this closed case. [12400589] (OC) [Entered: 03/21/2022 01:46 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Brenda M. Johnson motion for reconsideration. Deficiencies: None. Served on 01/29/2022. [12363246] (QDL) [Entered: 02/07/2022 04:49 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: DA) Appeal No. 22-35073 is dismissed as duplicative of closed appeal No. 22-35002. This order served on the district court shall act as and for the mandate of this court for appeal No. 22-35073. [12354336] (OC) [Entered: 01/28/2022 11:15 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Brenda M. Johnson opening brief due 03/25/2022. [12353305] (JMR) [Entered: 01/27/2022 11:57 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
