Institute for Free Speech v. Fred Jarrett, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: INSTITUTE FOR FREE SPEECH, a Virginia non-profit corporation
Defendant / Appellee: FRED JARRETT, in his official and personal capacities as Chair of the Washington Public Disclosure Commission, NANCY L. ISSERLIS, in her official capacity as Vice Chair of the Washington Public Disclosure Commission, WILLIAM DOWNING, in his official and personal capacities as a member of the Washington Public Disclosure Commission, RUSSELL LEHMAN, in his personal capacity as a former member of the Washington Public Disclosure Commission, PETER LAVALLE, in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Washington Public Disclosure Commission and ROBERT FERGUSON, in his official capacity as Washington's Attorney General
Case Number: 22-35112
Filed: February 8, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Constitutionality of State Statutes
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 8, 2022 Filing 9 Filed clerk order: The opening brief [ # 7 ] submitted by Institute for Free Speech is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: blue. The excerpts of record [ # 8 ] submitted by Institute for Free Speech are filed. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white covers. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [12416595] (LA) [Entered: 04/08/2022 04:41 PM]
April 8, 2022 Filing 8 Submitted (ECF) excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellant Institute for Free Speech. Date of service: 04/08/2022. [12416123] [22-35112] (Kolde, Endel) [Entered: 04/08/2022 11:40 AM]
April 8, 2022 Filing 7 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellant Institute for Free Speech. Date of service: 04/08/2022. [12416118] [22-35112] (Kolde, Endel) [Entered: 04/08/2022 11:37 AM]
March 3, 2022 Filing 6 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. [12385256] (LW) [Entered: 03/03/2022 11:25 AM]
February 16, 2022 Filing 5 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 03/02/2022, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [12372530] (LW) [Entered: 02/16/2022 03:18 PM]
February 14, 2022 Filing 4 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 02/14/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12370188]. [22-35112] (AD) [Entered: 02/14/2022 06:44 PM]
February 14, 2022 Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Institute for Free Speech Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 02/14/2022. [12369761] [22-35112] (Kolde, Endel) [Entered: 02/14/2022 03:01 PM]
February 11, 2022 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Institute for Free Speech Correspondence: Notice of No Transcripts Necessary in accordance with Circuit Rule 10-3.1(c). Date of service: 02/11/2022 [12367996] [22-35112] (Kolde, Endel) [Entered: 02/11/2022 01:44 PM]
February 8, 2022 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Institute for Free Speech Mediation Questionnaire due on 02/15/2022. Appellant Institute for Free Speech opening brief due 04/08/2022. Appellees William Downing, Robert Ferguson, Nancy L. Isserlis, Fred Jarrett, Peter Lavalle and Russell Lehman answering brief due 05/09/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12363604] (JMR) [Entered: 02/08/2022 09:37 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Institute for Free Speech v. Fred Jarrett, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: INSTITUTE FOR FREE SPEECH, a Virginia non-profit corporation
Represented By: Endel Kolde
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: FRED JARRETT, in his official and personal capacities as Chair of the Washington Public Disclosure Commission
Represented By: Karl D. Smith
Represented By: Tera Marie Heintz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: NANCY L. ISSERLIS, in her official capacity as Vice Chair of the Washington Public Disclosure Commission
Represented By: Karl D. Smith
Represented By: Tera Marie Heintz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: WILLIAM DOWNING, in his official and personal capacities as a member of the Washington Public Disclosure Commission
Represented By: Karl D. Smith
Represented By: Tera Marie Heintz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: RUSSELL LEHMAN, in his personal capacity as a former member of the Washington Public Disclosure Commission
Represented By: Christina Pfluger
Represented By: Christina L. Pfluger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: PETER LAVALLE, in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Washington Public Disclosure Commission
Represented By: Karl D. Smith
Represented By: Tera Marie Heintz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ROBERT FERGUSON, in his official capacity as Washington's Attorney General
Represented By: Karl D. Smith
Represented By: Tera Marie Heintz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?