James Hilliard v. Murphy Land Company, LLC
JAMES C. HILLIARD |
MURPHY LAND COMPANY, LLC, an Idaho Limited Liability Company |
22-35129 |
February 15, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other Contract Actions |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
JAMES HILLIARD V. MURPHY LAND COMPANY, LLC |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Streamlined request [9] by Appellant James C. Hilliard in 22-35129, Appellee James C. Hilliard in 22-35199 to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: First cross appeal brief due 05/18/2022 for James C. Hilliard. Second brief on cross appeal due 06/17/2022 for Murphy Land Company, LLC. Third brief on cross appeal due 07/18/2022 for James C. Hilliard. Optional cross appeal Reply brief for Murphy Land Company, LLC is due within 21 days of service of Third brief on cross appeal. [12415245] [22-35129, 22-35199] (BG) [Entered: 04/07/2022 03:03 PM] |
Filing 9 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellant James C. Hilliard in 22-35129. New requested due date is 05/16/2022. [12414692] [22-35129, 22-35199] (Dawson, James) [Entered: 04/07/2022 09:38 AM] |
Filing 8 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. [12394795] (LW) [Entered: 03/15/2022 09:00 AM] |
Filing 7 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 03/14/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12394567]. [22-35129] (AD) [Entered: 03/14/2022 06:44 PM] |
Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellee Murphy Land Company, LLC in 22-35129, Appellant Murphy Land Company, LLC in 22-35199 Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 03/14/2022. [12394160] [22-35129, 22-35199] (Bolinger, Dane) [Entered: 03/14/2022 02:57 PM] |
Filing 5 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. Setting cross-appeal briefing schedule as follows: Appellant Murphy Land Company, LLC Mediation Questionnaire due on 03/14/2022. First cross appeal brief due 04/18/2022 for James C. Hilliard. Second brief on cross appeal due 05/18/2022 for Murphy Land Company, LLC. Third brief on cross appeal due 06/20/2022 for James C. Hilliard. Optional cross appeal Reply brief for Murphy Land Company, LLC is due within 21 days of service of Third brief on cross appeal. [12387762] [22-35199, 22-35129] (RT) [Entered: 03/07/2022 11:11 AM] |
Filing 4 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 03/15/2022, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [12383263] (LW) [Entered: 03/01/2022 01:48 PM] |
Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 02/25/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12380252]. [22-35129] (AD) [Entered: 02/25/2022 12:44 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant James C. Hilliard Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 02/25/2022. [12379903] [22-35129] (Dawson, James) [Entered: 02/25/2022 09:38 AM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant James C. Hilliard Mediation Questionnaire due on 02/22/2022. Appellant James C. Hilliard opening brief due 04/18/2022. Appellee Murphy Land Company, LLC answering brief due 05/18/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12371040] (RT) [Entered: 02/15/2022 02:11 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: James Hilliard v. Murphy Land Company, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: JAMES C. HILLIARD | |
Represented By: | James L. Dawson |
Represented By: | Martin J. Martelle |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: MURPHY LAND COMPANY, LLC, an Idaho Limited Liability Company | |
Represented By: | Dane Bolinger |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.