Peter Adams v. Kake Tribal Corporation, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: PETER ADAMS
Defendant / Appellee: KAKE TRIBAL CORPORATION, JEFFREY W. HILLS and ROBERT D. MILLS
Case Number: 22-35134
Filed: February 17, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Stockholder's Suits
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 9, 2022 Filing 4 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is NOT SELECTED for inclusion in the Mediation Program. Counsel may contact Circuit Mediator to discuss services available through the Circuit Mediation Program or to request a settlement assessment conference. Info regarding the mediation program may be found at www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation. [12390016] (VS) [Entered: 03/09/2022 08:36 AM]
February 25, 2022 Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 02/25/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12380253]. [22-35134] (AD) [Entered: 02/25/2022 12:44 PM]
February 25, 2022 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Peter Adams Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 02/24/2022. [12380210] [22-35134] (Triem, Fred) [Entered: 02/25/2022 12:25 PM]
February 17, 2022 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Peter Adams Mediation Questionnaire due on 02/24/2022. Appellant Peter Adams opening brief due 04/18/2022. Appellees Jeffrey W. Hills, Kake Tribal Corporation and Robert D. Mills answering brief due 05/17/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12373312] (HH) [Entered: 02/17/2022 11:52 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Peter Adams v. Kake Tribal Corporation, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: PETER ADAMS
Represented By: Frederick William Triem
Represented By: Fred W. Triem
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: KAKE TRIBAL CORPORATION
Represented By: Herbert H. Ray Esquire Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JEFFREY W. HILLS
Represented By: Herbert H. Ray Esquire Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ROBERT D. MILLS
Represented By: Herbert H. Ray Esquire Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?