James Tarpey v. USA
JAMES TARPEY |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
22-35208 |
March 8, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Tax Suits |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. [12407281] (CL) [Entered: 03/29/2022 10:35 AM] |
Filing 7 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 04/06/2022, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [12398517] (CL) [Entered: 03/17/2022 05:32 PM] |
Filing 6 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 03/15/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12395776]. [22-35208] (AD) [Entered: 03/15/2022 06:44 PM] |
Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellant James Tarpey Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 03/15/2022. [12395601] [22-35208] (Morrison, Sean) [Entered: 03/15/2022 04:00 PM] |
Filing 4 Terminated Harris J. Phillips for USA in 22-35208. Party has alternate counsel. [12393658] (SVG) [Entered: 03/14/2022 11:14 AM] |
Filing 3 Added Attorney(s) Judith Ann Hagley for party(s) Appellee USA, in case 22-35208. [12389397] (DJV) [Entered: 03/08/2022 01:46 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Judith A. Hagley (U.S. Department of Justice, Tax Division, Appellate Section, Post Office Box 502, Washington, D.C. 20044) for Appellee USA. Date of service: 03/08/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12389365] [22-35208] (Hagley, Judith) [Entered: 03/08/2022 01:35 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant James Tarpey Mediation Questionnaire due on 03/15/2022. Transcript ordered by 04/04/2022. Transcript due 05/02/2022. Appellant James Tarpey opening brief due 06/13/2022. Appellee United States of America answering brief due 07/11/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12388965] (HH) [Entered: 03/08/2022 10:09 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: James Tarpey v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: JAMES TARPEY | |
Represented By: | Brian K. Gallik Esquire |
Represented By: | Sean Morrison |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Harris J. Phillips |
Represented By: | Judith Ann Hagley Esquire |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.