Anthony Weimer v. Microsoft Corporation, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANTHONY CRAIG WEIMER and ANTHONY C. WEIMER
Defendant / Appellee: MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation, GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware limited liability company and GOOGLE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Case Number: 22-35246
Filed: March 22, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
July 5, 2023 ANTHONY WEIMER V. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, ET AL

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 35 MANDATE ISSUED. (WCC, SRT and MBC) [12779265] (RL) [Entered: 08/23/2023 08:53 AM]
July 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 34 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): Weimers motion for appointment of counsel (Docket Entry No. [ # 33 ]) is denied. Weimers motion for an extension of time to file a petition for rehearing (Docket Entry No. [ # 33 ]) is granted. Any petition for rehearing is due on August 9, 2023. [12759739] (OC) [Entered: 07/21/2023 03:12 PM]
July 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 33 Filed Appellant Anthony C. Weimer motion for extension of time and for appointment of counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 07/13/2023. [12757622] (RL) [Entered: 07/18/2023 05:03 PM]
July 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 32 FILED MEMORANDUM (WILLIAM C. CANBY, SIDNEY R. THOMAS and MORGAN B. CHRISTEN) The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Weimers requests for oral argument, set forth in the opening and reply briefs, are denied. AFFIRMED. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [12748579] (AKM) [Entered: 07/05/2023 10:27 AM]
June 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 31 Appellee Google, Inc. in 22-35246 substituted by Appellee Google, LLC in 22-35246 [12739867] (SLM) [Entered: 06/21/2023 09:36 AM]
February 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 30 Terminated Simon J. Frankel for Microsoft Corporation in 22-35246 [12663018] (JFF) [Entered: 02/27/2023 04:03 PM]
February 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 29 Filed (ECF) Notice of withdrawal of counsel. Filed by Attorney Mr. Simon J. Frankel, Esquire for Appellee Microsoft Corporation. Party proceeding without counsel: No. Date of service: 02/27/2023. [12662558] [22-35246] (Frankel, Simon) [Entered: 02/27/2023 01:34 PM]
December 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 28 Received 6 paper copies of Reply Brief [ # 25 ] filed by Anthony C. Weimer. [12602118] (SD) [Entered: 12/05/2022 11:24 AM]
November 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 27 Filed clerk order: The reply brief [ # 25 ] submitted by Anthony C. Weimer is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: gray. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [12597323] (KT) [Entered: 11/28/2022 04:24 PM]
November 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 26 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: DC): Appellants motion to file a substitute reply brief (Docket Entry No. [ # 24 ]) is granted. The Clerk will strike the reply brief submitted at Docket Entry No. [22] and file the reply brief submitted at Docket Entry No. [ # 25 ]. [12596432] (OC) [Entered: 11/28/2022 10:10 AM]
November 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 25 Submitted (ECF) Reply Brief for review. Submitted by Appellant Anthony C. Weimer. Date of service: 11/15/2022. [12590696]-[COURT ENTERED FILING to correct entry [ # 24 ].] (KT) [Entered: 11/17/2022 04:40 PM]
November 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 24 Filed (ECF) Appellant Anthony C. Weimer Motion to file substitute or corrected brief. Date of service: 11/14/2022. [12587397] [22-35246]--[COURT UPDATE: removed PDF of reply brief, re-entered correctly in entry [ # 25 ]. 11/17/2022 by KT] (Weimer, Anthony) [Entered: 11/15/2022 09:53 AM]
November 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 23 Filed clerk order: The reply brief [22] submitted by Anthony C. Weimer is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: gray. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [12587381] (KT) [Entered: 11/15/2022 09:46 AM]
November 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 22 STRICKEN PER ORDER [ # 26 ] Submitted (ECF) Reply Brief for review. Submitted by Appellant Anthony C. Weimer. Date of service: 11/14/2022. [12586708] [22-35246] (Weimer, Anthony) [Entered: 11/14/2022 03:34 PM]
October 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 21 Streamlined request [20] by Appellant Anthony C. Weimer to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: the optional reply brief is due 11/14/2022. [12566241] (BG) [Entered: 10/18/2022 11:59 AM]
October 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 20 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Reply Brief by Appellant Anthony C. Weimer. New requested due date is 11/14/2022. [12565924] [22-35246] (Weimer, Anthony) [Entered: 10/18/2022 09:18 AM]
October 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 Received 3 paper copies of supplemental excerpts of record [ # 14 ] in 1 volume(s) filed by Microsoft Corporation. [12560327] (CPA) [Entered: 10/11/2022 03:07 PM]
October 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 18 Received 6 paper copies of Answering Brief [ # 13 ] filed by Microsoft Corporation. [12560315] (CPA) [Entered: 10/11/2022 03:04 PM]
October 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 Received 6 paper copies of Answering Brief [ # 12 ] filed by Google, Inc.. [12556721] (SD) [Entered: 10/05/2022 02:40 PM]
October 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 Filed clerk order: The answering brief [ # 13 ] submitted by Microsoft Corporation is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: red. The supplemental excerpts of record [ # 14 ] submitted by Microsoft Corporation are filed. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white covers. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [12555378] (SML) [Entered: 10/04/2022 10:06 AM]
September 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Filed clerk order: The answering brief [ # 12 ] submitted by Google, Inc. is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: red. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [12553295] (SML) [Entered: 09/30/2022 10:53 AM]
September 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 Submitted (ECF) supplemental excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellee Microsoft Corporation. Date of service: 09/28/2022. [12551730] [22-35246]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected excerpts. 10/04/2022 by SML] (Frankel, Simon) [Entered: 09/28/2022 02:42 PM]
September 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Submitted (ECF) Answering Brief for review. Submitted by Appellee Microsoft Corporation. Date of service: 09/28/2022. [12551714] [22-35246]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected brief. 10/04/2022 by SML] (Frankel, Simon) [Entered: 09/28/2022 02:37 PM]
September 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Submitted (ECF) Answering Brief for review. Submitted by Appellee Google, Inc.. Date of service: 09/28/2022. [12551703] [22-35246] (Hofmann, Michael) [Entered: 09/28/2022 02:31 PM]
August 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Streamlined request [10] by Appellee Microsoft Corporation to extend time to file the brief is approved FOR ALL APPELLEES. Amended briefing schedule: Appellees Google, Inc. and Microsoft Corporation answering brief due 09/28/2022. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12510023] (BG) [Entered: 08/04/2022 05:29 PM]
August 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Answering Brief by Appellee Microsoft Corporation. New requested due date is 09/28/2022. [12509967] [22-35246] (Frankel, Simon) [Entered: 08/04/2022 04:16 PM]
August 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Received 6 paper copies of Opening Brief [ # 7 ] filed by Anthony C. Weimer. [12506576] (SD) [Entered: 08/01/2022 02:41 PM]
July 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Filed clerk order: The opening brief [ # 7 ] submitted by Anthony C. Weimer is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: not applicable. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [12504106] (KT) [Entered: 07/28/2022 11:00 AM]
July 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellant Anthony C. Weimer. Date of service: 07/27/2022. [12503387] [22-35246] (Weimer, Anthony) [Entered: 07/27/2022 12:16 PM]
June 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Streamlined request by Appellant Anthony C. Weimer to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant Anthony C. Weimer opening brief due 07/29/2022. Appellees Google, Inc. and Microsoft Corporation answering brief due 08/29/2022. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. Appellant, Anthony C. Weimer, is set up for electronic filing. All future filings must be submitted electronically via CM/ECF. [12477956] (JN) [Entered: 06/23/2022 07:47 AM]
March 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 03/29/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12408690]. [22-35246] (AD) [Entered: 03/30/2022 12:44 PM]
March 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Filed Appellant Anthony C. Weimer Mediation Questionnaire. Served on 03/24/22. [12408139] (JFF) [Entered: 03/30/2022 08:53 AM]
March 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. Amount Paid: USD 505.00. Date paid: 03/25/2022. [12405234] (RT) [Entered: 03/25/2022 01:50 PM]
March 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12404108] (CKP) [Entered: 03/24/2022 12:06 PM]
March 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Transcript ordered by 04/20/2022. Transcript due 05/20/2022. Appellant Anthony Craig Weimer opening brief due 06/29/2022. Appellees Google, Inc. and Microsoft Corporation answering brief due 07/29/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12401828] (RT) [Entered: 03/22/2022 01:53 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Anthony Weimer v. Microsoft Corporation, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: ANTHONY CRAIG WEIMER
Represented By: Anthony Craig Weimer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: ANTHONY C. WEIMER
Represented By: Anthony C. Weimer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation
Represented By: Nathan Bilyeu
Represented By: Simon J. Frankel Esquire
Represented By: Breanna Katherine Jones
Represented By: Murry Warhank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware limited liability company
Represented By: Michael J. Hofmann
Represented By: Paul J. Lopach
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: GOOGLE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Represented By: Michael J. Hofmann
Represented By: Paul J. Lopach
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?