Timothy Dunlap v. IMSI, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: TIMOTHY ALLAN DUNLAP
Defendant / Appellee: IMSI and CAMPBELL, Dr.
Case Number: 22-35253
Filed: March 24, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner-Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
July 31, 2023 TIMOTHY DUNLAP V. IMSI, ET AL

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 10, 2022 Filing 4 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court. [12442492] (RL) [Entered: 05/10/2022 09:20 AM]
April 18, 2022 Filing 3 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): The courts records reflect that appellant filed a timely motion listed in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(4), and that motion is still pending in the district court. The March 22, 2022 notice of appeal is therefore ineffective until entry of the order disposing of the last such motion outstanding. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). Accordingly, proceedings in this court are held in abeyance pending the district courts resolution of the pending March 23, 2022 motion. See Leader Natl Ins. Co. v. Indus. Indem. Ins. Co., 19 F.3d 444, 445 (9th Cir. 1994); Tripati v. Henman, 845 F.2d 205, 206 (9th Cir. 1988). Within 14 days after the district courts ruling on the pending motion, appellant shall file a written notice in this court: (1) informing this court of the district courts ruling; and (2) stating whether appellant intends to prosecute this appeal. To appeal the district courts ruling on the post-judgment motion, appellant must file an amended notice of appeal within the time prescribed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4. The Clerk shall serve this order on the district court. [12424738] (CKP) [Entered: 04/18/2022 04:25 PM]
April 13, 2022 Filing 2 Filed Appellant Timothy Allan Dunlap motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 04/11/2022. [12419605] (RL) [Entered: 04/13/2022 09:25 AM]
March 24, 2022 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Timothy Allan Dunlap opening brief due 05/23/2022. Appellees Campbell and IMSI answering brief due 06/20/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12403846] (ABT) [Entered: 03/24/2022 09:59 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Timothy Dunlap v. IMSI, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: TIMOTHY ALLAN DUNLAP
Represented By: Timothy Allan Dunlap
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: IMSI
Represented By: Kristina M. Schindele Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CAMPBELL, Dr.
Represented By: Kristina M. Schindele Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?