Ronald Strasser, Jr. v. State of Oregon, et al
| RONALD KENNETH STRASSER, Jr. |
| STATE OF OREGON, by and through Governor Kate Brown, in her individual capacity, KATE BROWN, in her individual capacity, SHELLEY HOFFMAN, State Risk Manager, ERIC MACHADO, Clackamas County Risk and Safety Manager, CRAIG ROBERTS, Clackamas County Sheriff, in his individual capacity, DAVE M. ELLINGTON, Clackamas County Under Sheriff, in his individual capacity, DANIEL JOSEPH O'KEEFE, Clackamas County Sheriff Deputy, in his private capacity, GREG KEPPLER, Clackamas County Sheriff Deputy, in his private capacity, KATY COBA, Department of Administrative Services, DEBBIE SPRADLEY, Trial Court Administrator, JOHN S. FOOTE, Clackamas County District Attorney, CHRISTOPHER K. HAYWOOD, Assistant D.A., DONALD KRUPP, County Administrator, LAUREL BUTMAN, Chief Executive Officer Deputy, KEN HUMBERSTON, Commissioner, MORGAN GUTHNER, Clackamas County Sheriff Deputy, in his private capacity, DAVID O'SHAUGHNESSY, Captain, in their private capacity, COREY R. SMITH, Sergeant, in their private capacity, ROBERT HERNDON, Clackamas County Circuit Court Officer, Judge, JEFFREY S. JONES, Clackamas County Circuit Court Officer, Judge, THOMAS J. RASTETTER, Clackamas County Circuit Court Officer, Judge, OREGON STATE SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION, PAT GARRETT, Sheriff; 2017 OSSA President & Washington County Sheriff, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY SYSTEMS AND TRAINING, DPI SECURITY, FKA DePaul Security Service, JOEL MANLEY, SAMANTHA OLSON, CLACKAMAS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE PROFESSIONAL STANDARD UNIT, KEN BOELL, Lieutenant, SHANE STRANGFIELD, Captain, DAN SMITH, Detective, ALL CLERKS OF CLACKAMAS COUNTY COURT AND THEIR ASSOCIATES, ALL OTHER DEPUTY'S DIRECTLY AND INDIRECTLY INVOLVED and JOHN AND JANE DOES, 1-100 |
| 22-35265 |
| March 29, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 MANDATE ISSUED. (RAP, JBR and PJW) [12446118] (RL) [Entered: 05/13/2022 09:26 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed order (RICHARD A. PAEZ, JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON and PAUL J. WATFORD) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the orders challenged in the appeal are not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Branson v. City of Los Angeles, 912 F.2d 334, 336 (9th Cir. 1990) (denial of reconsideration of non-appealable order is itself not appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12427431] (JBS) [Entered: 04/21/2022 09:57 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Ronald Kenneth Strasser Jr. opening brief due 05/31/2022. Appellees All Clerks of Clackamas County Court and their associates, All other deputy's directly and indirectly involved, Ken Boell, Kate Brown, Laurel Butman, Clackamas County Sheriff's Office Professional Standard Unit, Katy Coba, DPI Security, Department of Public Safety Systems and Training, Dave M. Ellington, John S. Foote, Pat Garrett, Morgan Guthner, Christopher K. Haywood, Robert Herndon, Shelley Hoffman, Ken Humberston, John And Jane Does, Jeffrey S. Jones, Greg Keppler, Donald Krupp, Eric Machado, Joel Manley, Daniel Joseph O'Keefe, David O'Shaughnessy, Samantha Olson, Oregon State Sheriff's Association, Thomas J. Rastetter, Craig Roberts, Corey R. Smith, Dan Smith, Debbie Spradley, State of Oregon and Shane Strangfield answering brief due 07/01/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12407509] (RT) [Entered: 03/29/2022 12:37 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
