James Murphy v. Hannah Dockery-Mosebach, et al
| JAMES MICHAEL MURPHY, MD |
| HANNAH DOCKERY-MOSEBACH and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 22-35392 |
| May 19, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Personal Property Damage |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Filed order MEDIATION (RSK): This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. [12488935] (RT) [Entered: 07/07/2022 04:27 PM] |
| Filing 11 Streamlined request by Appellant James Michael Murphy to extend time to file the brief is not approved because it is unnecessary. The briefing schedule is stayed. See 9th Cir. R. 27-11. [12471088] (JN) [Entered: 06/14/2022 03:24 PM] |
| Filing 10 Filed Appellant James Michael Murphy motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [12470968] (NAC) [Entered: 06/14/2022 02:27 PM] |
| Filing 9 Filed Appellant James Michael Murphy motion to extend time to file appellant opening brief until. Deficiencies: None. [12470962] (NAC) [Entered: 06/14/2022 02:26 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed Appellant James Michael Murphy motion to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: None. [12470959] (NAC) [Entered: 06/14/2022 02:25 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed Appellant James Michael Murphy statement why appeal should move forward. [12470955] (NAC) [Entered: 06/14/2022 02:23 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed order MEDIATION (RK): The Mediation Program of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. See Fed. R. App. P. 33 and Ninth Cir. R. 33- 1. As part of a pilot project, the Mediation Program is exploring settlement potential in some cases in which one party is proceeding pro se (representing themselves without the assistance of an attorney). This case is being included in that pilot project. By June 28, 2022,the parties are requested to inform the Circuit Mediator in writing whether the issues on appeal or in the underlying dispute might be appropriate for settlement discussions. The written response to this order and all future written or spoken communication with the mediator are strictly confidential mediation communications protected by Ninth Circuit Rule 33-1 and cannot be disclosed outside the mediation process..... The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. (see order for full text). [12468514] (RT) [Entered: 06/10/2022 12:47 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellee may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal or statement that the appeal should go forward. [12461175] (CKP) [Entered: 06/01/2022 02:04 PM] |
| Filing 4 Added Attorney(s) Renata Gowie for party(s) Appellee USA, in case 22-35392. [12451826] (NAC) [Entered: 05/19/2022 03:32 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Renata A. Gowie (U.S. Attorney's Office, 1000 SW Third Avenue, Suite 600, Portland, Oregon 97204) for Appellee USA. Date of service: 05/19/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12451818] [22-35392] (Gowie, Renata) [Entered: 05/19/2022 03:29 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12451757] (CKP) [Entered: 05/19/2022 02:48 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant James Michael Murphy opening brief due 07/20/2022. Appellees Hannah Dockery-Mosebach and United States of America answering brief due 08/22/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12451587] (RT) [Entered: 05/19/2022 01:50 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
