Andrew Moret v. Kate Brown, et al
| ANDREW GUY MORET |
| KATE BROWN, STATE OF OREGON, OREGON DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ELLEN ROSENBLUM, OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, COLETTE PETERS, OREGON PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES COMMISSION, ERNEST G. LANNET, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MARTHA WALTERS, JAMES C. EGAN, THERESA M. KIDD, VANESSA A. NORDYKE, CHANNING BENNETT, COURTLAND GEYER, DANIEL WREN, ANDREW R. ERWIN, D.C. BAILEY, STEVE LINDSEY, OSCAR GARCIA, CHRISTINE LINDSEY, BRACKEN MCKEY, RAINEY MEISEL, SETH WHITE, JOHN GUTBEZAHL, SHAWN WILEY, JASON HESS, JANET NORTON, EMILY ELISON, Tarchia Law Firm, MATT SERRES, K. MAIN, SRCI, ELIZABETH JARRY, LT. KENYON, SRCI, COX, SRCI-ODOC, MARION CTY., WASH. CTY., CLERKS/ADMIN., Wash. Cty. Ct., Marion Cty. Ct., Or. App. Ct. and Or. Sp. Ct., ADAM KIDWELL, OCTAVIO CHOI, Dr., DR. VARMA PENUMETCHA, OSH, CYNTHIA BARNETT, KELLY CARLSON, LAWSON, OSP-Law Library, OREGON STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, OREGON COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL FITNESS & DISABILITY, OREGON DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, MARION CTY. CT/S, WASHINGTON CTY. CT/S, OREGON APPELLATE COURTS, OREGON SUPREME COURT, OREGON STATE HOSPITAL, SNAKE RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUION, METROPOLITAN PUBLIC DEFENDERS, CENTURYLINK/IC SOLUTIONS/ODOC PHONE SYSTEMS, OREGON APPEALS COURT, ROCHESTER, SRCI, SIGRAH, SRCI, OREGON ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENT, Administrators, OREGON JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT, POORNIMA RANGANATHAN, OREGON EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT, MUSTAFA KASUBHAI, MICHAEL MCSHANE, USDC-OR and UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT |
| 22-35424 |
| June 1, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Filed (ECF) Appellees Kate Brown, Ernest G. Lannet, ODOC, Oregon Department of Justice, Oregon Public Defense Services Commission, Colette Peters, Ellen Rosenblum and State of Oregon Motion to extend time to file a response until 08/09/2022. Date of service: 07/29/2022. [12505385] [22-35424] (Fjordbeck, Denise) [Entered: 07/29/2022 02:55 PM] |
| Filing 13 Filed Appellant Andrew Guy Moret motion to certify class action. Deficiencies: None. Served on 07/11/2022. [12501706] (HH) [Entered: 07/25/2022 03:29 PM] |
| Filing 12 Filed Appellant Andrew Guy Moret EMERGENCY motion for relief. Deficiencies: None. Served on 07/11/2022. [12501702] (HH) [Entered: 07/25/2022 03:27 PM] |
| Filing 11 Filed original and 0 copies of Appellant Andrew Guy Moret opening brief of 10 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 07/19/2022. (IFP motion pending, briefing remains stayed.) [12501353] (KT) [Entered: 07/25/2022 01:00 PM] |
| Filing 10 Filed Appellant Andrew Guy Moret's ex parte reply to response to statement that appeal should go forward. [12490099] (HH) [Entered: 07/10/2022 02:04 PM] |
| Filing 9 Filed Appellant Andrew Guy Moret letter dated 06/29/2022 re: Requesting copy of mediation questionnaire. (Copy of MQ sent) Paper filing deficiency: None. [12488080] (HH) [Entered: 07/07/2022 09:21 AM] |
| Filing 8 Filed Appellant Andrew Guy Moret's certificate of interested parties in this appeal. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12487946] (HH) [Entered: 07/06/2022 08:48 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed Appellant Andrew Guy Moret motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/29/2022. [12487945] (HH) [Entered: 07/06/2022 08:47 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12475522] (CKP) [Entered: 06/21/2022 11:41 AM] |
| Filing 5 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 22-35424: Due] ). [12474893] (CKP) [Entered: 06/20/2022 12:10 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellees Kate Brown, Ernest G. Lannet, ODOC, Oregon Department of Justice, Oregon Public Defense Services Commission, Colette Peters, Ellen Rosenblum and State of Oregon response to motion ([ # 3 ] Party Motion). Date of service: 06/16/2022. [12473256] [22-35424] (Fjordbeck, Denise) [Entered: 06/16/2022 02:19 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Andrew Guy Moret motions to consolidate with 22-35016, to appoint counsel, to present pre-emptory questions on appeal, and statement that appeal should go forward. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/06/2022. [12465467] (HH) [Entered: 06/07/2022 12:41 PM] |
| Filing 2 Received copy of District Court Order (Text Only Entry) filed on 06/01/2022: Motion to proceed in forma pauperis denied. [12461203] (HH) [Entered: 06/01/2022 02:20 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Andrew Guy Moret opening brief due 07/25/2022. Appellees D.C. Bailey, Cynthia Barnett, Channing Bennett, Kate Brown, Kelly Carlson, CenturyLink/IC Solutions/ODOC Phone Systems, Octavio Choi, Clerks/Admin., Cox, James C. Egan, Emily Elison, Andrew R. Erwin, Oscar Garcia, Courtland Geyer, John Gutbezahl, Jason Hess, Elizabeth Jarry, Mustafa Kasubhai, Kenyon, Theresa M. Kidd, Adam Kidwell, Ernest G. Lannet, Lawson, Christine Lindsey, Steve Lindsey, K. Main, Marion Cty., Marion Cty. Ct/s, Bracken McKey, Michael McShane, Rainey Meisel, Metropolitan Public Defenders, Vanessa A. Nordyke, Janet Norton, Oregon Administrative Department, Oregon Appeals Court, Oregon Appellate Courts, Oregon Commission on Judicial Fitness & Disability, Oregon Department of Administrative Services, Oregon Department of Corrections, Oregon Department of Justice, Oregon Executive Department, Oregon Judicial Department, Oregon Public Defense Services Commission, Oregon State Bar Association, Oregon State Hospital, Oregon Supreme Court, Varma Penumetcha, Colette Peters, Poornima Ranganathan, Rochester, Ellen Rosenblum, Matt Serres, Sigrah, Snake River Correctional Instituion, State of Oregon, United States Government, United States of America, Martha Walters, Wash. Cty., Washington Cty. Ct/s, Seth White, Shawn Wiley and Daniel Wren answering brief due 08/24/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12460883] (JMR) [Entered: 06/01/2022 11:27 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.