Adrienne Perry v. Terry White, et al
| ADRIENNE R. PERRY and ADRIENNE RENEE PERRY |
| TERRY WHITE, General Manager, King County Metro and DOW CONSTANTINE, County Executive, King County |
| 22-35459 |
| June 13, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Jobs |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| ADRIENNE PERRY V. TERRY WHITE, ET AL |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filed order (Appellate Commissioner): The motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. [ # 3 ]) is granted. The Clerk will update the docket to reflect this status. The opening brief remains due August 9, 2022. Because appellant is proceeding without counsel, appellant is not required to file excerpts of record. See 9th Cir. R. 30-1.3. Because there is no appearance by appellees, briefing will be complete upon the filing of the opening brief. (MOATT) [12492052] (RY) [Entered: 07/12/2022 02:27 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Ms. Adrienne Renee Perry FORM 4 motion and affidavit for permission to proceed in forma pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/18/2022. [12477727] (RL) [Entered: 06/22/2022 03:59 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12469798] (CKP) [Entered: 06/13/2022 12:49 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Adrienne R. Perry opening brief due 08/09/2022. [12469526] (JBS) [Entered: 06/13/2022 10:53 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
