Kodiak Blaine, et al v. Benefis Health System, et al
| KODIAK BLAINE, DOUGLAS DARKO, CHRISTOPHER FLOWER, REYNOLDS HERTEL, KAREN LAPPI, APRIL POSEY, TERRI SEARSDODD, EDWARD NELSON, JON L. WILLIAMS and EMILY HARO, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated |
| BENEFIS HEALTH SYSTEM, BENEFIS HOSPITALS, INC., BENEFIS MEDICAL GROUP, INC., KALISPELL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, MAGELLAN RESOURCE PARTNERS, LLC, AKA Medequity, AKA Medequity Corp., AKA Medequity, Inc. and MEDEQUITY CORPORATION |
| 22-35497 |
| June 27, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Civil (Rico) |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| KODIAK BLAINE, ET AL V. BENEFIS HEALTH SYSTEM, ET AL |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Kodiak Blaine, Douglas Darko, Christopher Flower, Emily Haro, Reynolds Hertel, Karen Lappi, Edward Nelson, April Posey, Terri Searsdodd and Jon L. Williams Mediation Questionnaire due on 07/05/2022. Appellants Kodiak Blaine, Douglas Darko, Christopher Flower, Emily Haro, Reynolds Hertel, Karen Lappi, Edward Nelson, April Posey, Terri Searsdodd and Jon L. Williams opening brief due 08/22/2022. Appellees Benefis Health System, Benefis Hospitals, Inc., Benefis Medical Group, Inc., Kalispell Regional Medical Center, Magellan Resource Partners, LLC and Medequity Corporation answering brief due 09/21/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12480960] (JBS) [Entered: 06/27/2022 02:41 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
