Allstate Indemnity Company v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al
ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY and RANDY LINDQUIST, an individual |
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. |
G & J RESTORATION, INC., DBA Paul Davis of Greater Seattle and MELODY J. GRONDAHL |
22-35509 |
June 30, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Insurance |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: RSK): Appellants motion to voluntarily dismiss this appeal (Docket Entry No. [ # 9 ]) is granted. Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). The parties shall bear their own costs and attorneys fees on appeal. A copy of this order shall serve as and for the mandate of this court. Appellees motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction (Docket Entry No. [ # 6 ]) is denied as moot. [12523301] (AF) [Entered: 08/22/2022 04:54 PM] |
Filing 9 Filed (ECF) Appellant Allstate Indemnity Company Motion to dismiss case voluntarily pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Date of service: 08/11/2022. [12514795] [22-35509] (Tribe, Sidney) [Entered: 08/11/2022 09:53 AM] |
Filing 8 MEDIATION ORDER FILED - Appellant to respond to motion to dismiss 09/07/2022. See order for details. [12512951] (VS) [Entered: 08/09/2022 10:38 AM] |
Filing 7 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Conference, 08/25/2022, 09:00 a.m., Pacific Time. See order for details. [12511688] (VS) [Entered: 08/08/2022 10:50 AM] |
Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellee JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Date of service: 08/03/2022. [12508307] [22-35509] (Haist, Frederick) [Entered: 08/03/2022 09:11 AM] |
Filing 5 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN AssessmentConference, 08/08/2022, 09:00 a.m., PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12497459] (VS) [Entered: 07/19/2022 01:55 PM] |
Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): In addition to all other issues the parties wish to raise in their briefs, the parties are directed to address the scope of this courts jurisdiction over this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4); Mt. Graham Red Squirrel v. Madigan, 954 F.2d 1441, 1462-63 (9th Cir. 1992) (observing that on a timely appeal from an order resolving an untimely tolling motion, the court of appeals has jurisdiction to review only the order on the post-judgment motion, not the underlying judgment). The established briefing schedule remains in effect. [12494360] (AF) [Entered: 07/14/2022 05:16 PM] |
Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 07/07/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12488479]. [22-35509] (AD) [Entered: 07/07/2022 12:44 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Allstate Indemnity Company Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 07/07/2022. [12488067] [22-35509] (Tribe, Sidney) [Entered: 07/07/2022 09:09 AM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Allstate Indemnity Company Mediation Questionnaire due on 07/07/2022. Transcript ordered by 07/29/2022. Transcript due 08/29/2022. Appellant Allstate Indemnity Company opening brief due 10/07/2022. Appellee JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. answering brief due 11/07/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12484169] (JBS) [Entered: 06/30/2022 01:54 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.