James Fudge v. Bret Bennett, et al
JAMES CHARLES FUDGE |
BRET BENNETT, NANCY ARMSTRONG, JEREMY BEAUMONT, K. MCNULTY, J. SCOTT, B. BROOKS, C. BUTTRAM, C. NEAL, L. CONE, J. RODRIQUEZ, A. JOHNSON, J. LLOYD, G. DURHAM, J. OLIVE, D. HANDSEN, F. RANGEL, W. KING, P. LETTUNICH, J. TAYLOR, C. HUSTON, C. MOOTHART, E. CARBAJAL, Jr., C. FORD, JOHN DOE(S) and JANE DOE(S) |
22-35708 |
September 8, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 MANDATE ISSUED. (MDS, DAB and LVD) [12564345] (DJV) [Entered: 10/17/2022 07:09 AM] |
Filing 6 Filed Appellant James Charles Fudge motion for appointment of counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 09/21/2022. [12549498] (DJV) [Entered: 09/26/2022 02:20 PM] |
Filing 5 Filed Appellant James Charles Fudge motion to correct the caption. Deficiencies: None. Served on 09/19/2022. [12549493] (DJV) [Entered: 09/26/2022 02:18 PM] |
Filing 4 Filed order (MILAN D. SMITH, JR., DANIEL A. BRESS and LAWRENCE VANDYKE): A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See Serine v. Peterson, 989 F.2d 371, 372-73 (9th Cir. 1993) (magistrate judges findings and recommendations not appealable; premature appeal not cured by subsequent entry of final judgment by district court); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order is not appealable unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or judgment is entered in compliance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b)). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12547831] (AF) [Entered: 09/23/2022 11:53 AM] |
Filing 3 Added Attorney(s) Denise Gale Fjordbeck for party(s) Appellee J. Scott Appellee Bret Bennett Appellee J. Taylor Appellee J. Lloyd Appellee K. McNulty Appellee C. Buttram Appellee L. Cone Appellee C. Neal Appellee F. Rangel Appellee D. Handsen Appellee C. Huston Appellee Jeremy Beaumont Appellee A. Johnson Appellee B. Brooks Appellee John Doe(s) Appellee E. Carbajal Jr. Appellee C. Ford Appellee P. Lettunich Appellee G. Durham Appellee Jane Doe(s) Appellee J. Rodriquez Appellee J. Olive Appellee W. King Appellee C. Moothart Appellee Nancy Armstrong, in case 22-35708. [12547740] (DJV) [Entered: 09/23/2022 11:11 AM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Denise G. Fjordbeck (Oregon Department of Justice - Appellate Division, 1162 Court Street NE, Salem, Oregon 97301) for Appellees Nancy Armstrong, Jeremy Beaumont, Bret Bennett, B. Brooks, C. Buttram, E. Carbajal, Jr., L. Cone, G. Durham, C. Ford, D. Handsen, C. Huston, A. Johnson, W. King, P. Lettunich, K. McNulty, C. Moothart, C. Neal, J. Olive, F. Rangel, J. Rodriquez, J. Scott and J. Taylor. Substitution for Attorney Shannon Vincent for Appellees Nancy Armstrong, Jeremy Beaumont, Bret Bennett, B. Brooks, C. Buttram, E. Carbajal, Jr., L. Cone, G. Durham, C. Ford, D. Handsen, C. Huston, A. Johnson, W. King, P. Lettunich, K. McNulty, C. Moothart, C. Neal, J. Olive, F. Rangel, J. Rodriquez, J. Scott and J. Taylor. Date of service: 09/23/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12547711] [22-35708] (Fjordbeck, Denise) [Entered: 09/23/2022 11:01 AM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Transcript ordered by 10/06/2022. Transcript due 11/07/2022. Appellant James Charles Fudge opening brief due 11/07/2022. Appellees Nancy Armstrong, Jeremy Beaumont, Bret Bennett, B. Brooks, C. Buttram, E. Carbajal Jr., L. Cone, G. Durham, C. Ford, D. Handsen, C. Huston, Jane Doe(s), John Doe(s), A. Johnson, W. King, P. Lettunich, J. Lloyd, K. McNulty, C. Moothart, C. Neal, J. Olive, F. Rangel, J. Rodriquez, J. Scott and J. Taylor answering brief due 12/05/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12536421] (ABT) [Entered: 09/08/2022 03:42 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.