Renaldo White, et al v. Symetra Assigned Benefits Service Company, et al
| RENALDO WHITE and RANDOLPH NADEAU, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated |
| SYMETRA ASSIGNED BENEFITS SERVICE COMPANY and SYMETRA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY |
| 22-35748 |
| September 23, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Insurance |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. [12574862] (CL) [Entered: 10/27/2022 03:45 PM] |
| Filing 8 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 10/27/2022, 10:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12558753] (CL) [Entered: 10/07/2022 03:01 PM] |
| Filing 7 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. Amount Paid: USD 505.00. Date paid: 10/03/2022. [12555452] (RT) [Entered: 10/04/2022 10:34 AM] |
| Filing 6 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 09/30/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12553944]. [22-35748] (AD) [Entered: 09/30/2022 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellants Symetra Assigned Benefits Service Company and Symetra Life Insurance Company Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 09/30/2022. [12553636] [22-35748] (O'Connor, Maeve) [Entered: 09/30/2022 02:35 PM] |
| Filing 4 Added Attorney(s) Sydney Read for party(s) Appellee Randolph Nadeau Appellee Renaldo White, in case 22-35748. [12548080] (BJK) [Entered: 09/23/2022 02:12 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Sydney Jacqueline Read (Keller Rohrback L.L.P., 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3200, Seattle, WA 98101) for Appellees Randolph Nadeau and Renaldo White. Date of service: 09/23/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12548028] [22-35748] (Read, Sydney) [Entered: 09/23/2022 01:51 PM] |
| Filing 2 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Symetra Assigned Benefits Service Company and Symetra Life Insurance Company Mediation Questionnaire due on 09/30/2022. Transcript ordered by 10/24/2022. Transcript due 11/23/2022. Appellants Symetra Assigned Benefits Service Company and Symetra Life Insurance Company opening brief due 01/04/2023. Appellees Randolph Nadeau and Renaldo White answering brief due 02/06/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12547876] (RT) [Entered: 09/23/2022 12:28 PM] |
| Filing 1 Filed order (DANIEL A. BRESS and LAWRENCE VANDYKE, Circuit Judges) in case no. 22-80084 on September 22, 2022 : The court, in its discretion, grants the petition for permission to appeal the district courts August 3, 2022 order granting in part and denying in part class action certification. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(f); Chamberlan v. Ford Motor Co., 402 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 2005) (stating standard). Within 14 days after the date of this order, petitioners shall perfect the appeal in accordance with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 5(d). [12547872] (RT) [Entered: 09/23/2022 12:25 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
