John Morris , III v. Biotronik, Inc., et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOHN MORRIS III
Defendant / Appellee: BIOTRONIK, INC., JOHN DOES, 1-10, JANE DOES, 1-10, DOE PARTNERSHIPS, 1-10, DOE CORPORATIONS, 1-10, ROE NON-PROFIT CORPORATIONS, 1-10 and ROE GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES, 1-10
Case Number: 22-35753
Filed: September 26, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights Jobs
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 14, 2022 Filing 6 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Conference, 12/05/2022, 3:00 p.m., Pacific Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court is amended as follows: Appellant John Morris III opening brief due 01/20/2023. Appellees Biotronik, Inc., Doe Corporations, Doe Partnerships, Jane Does, John Does, Roe Governmental Entities and Roe Non-Profit Corporations answering brief due 02/21/2023. Appellants optional reply brief is due within 21 days afer service of the answering brief. See order for details. [12585765] (VS) [Entered: 11/14/2022 08:58 AM]
November 1, 2022 Filing 5 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Conference w/ counsel for appellant, 11/10/2022, 3:30 p.m., Pacific Time. See order for details. [12578213] (VS) [Entered: 11/01/2022 03:17 PM]
October 6, 2022 Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 11/01/2022, 2:00 p.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12557183] (CL) [Entered: 10/06/2022 09:54 AM]
October 3, 2022 Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 10/03/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12555148]. [22-35753] (AD) [Entered: 10/03/2022 06:44 PM]
October 3, 2022 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant John Morris, III Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 10/03/2022. [12554552] [22-35753] (Barbour, Rechelle) [Entered: 10/03/2022 01:17 PM]
September 26, 2022 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant John Morris III Mediation Questionnaire due on 10/03/2022. Appellant John Morris III opening brief due 11/28/2022. Appellees Biotronik, Inc., Doe Corporations, Doe Partnerships, Jane Does, John Does, Roe Governmental Entities and Roe Non-Profit Corporations answering brief due 12/28/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12549850] (RT) [Entered: 09/26/2022 04:21 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: John Morris , III v. Biotronik, Inc., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: JOHN MORRIS III
Represented By: Rechelle Barbour
Represented By: Damien Munsinger
Represented By: Laurent J. Remillard Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: BIOTRONIK, INC.
Represented By: Todd A. Hanchett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JOHN DOES, 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JANE DOES, 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DOE PARTNERSHIPS, 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DOE CORPORATIONS, 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ROE NON-PROFIT CORPORATIONS, 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ROE GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES, 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?