Gerald Barnes, II v. Marsha BERZON, et al
| GERALD LEROY BARNES II |
| MARSHA S. BERZON, Judge, PAUL WATFORD, Judge and RAYMOND CORLEY FISHER, Judge |
| 22-35770 |
| September 29, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Filed Appellant Gerald LeRoy Barnes, II letter dated 11/13/2022 re: Case information. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12592706] (QDL) [Entered: 11/21/2022 01:51 PM] |
| Filing 11 Received notice of change of address dated 11/09/2022 from Gerald LeRoy Barnes, II. New address: #10282028, Clackamas County Jail, 2206 Kaen Road, Oregon City, OR 97045. [12589389] (QDL) [Entered: 11/16/2022 04:40 PM] |
| Filing 9 Filed Appellant Gerald LeRoy Barnes, II response to order to show cause dated 10/19/2022. [12589096] (QDL) [Entered: 11/16/2022 02:43 PM] |
| Filing 10 Filed Appellant Gerald LeRoy Barnes, II letter re: Schedule order. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12589132] (QDL) [Entered: 11/16/2022 02:56 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AT): A review of the record reflects that this appeal may be frivolous. This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), OR (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant does not move to dismiss this appeal, the court may dismiss the appeal as frivolous, without further notice. Any determination of whether the appeal is frivolous will be based on the opening brief received on October 17, 2022, and appellants statement, if any, in response to this order. If the court dismisses the appeal as frivolous, this appeal may be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss this appeal or statement that the appeal should go forward. [12567965] (JBS) [Entered: 10/19/2022 03:04 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed original and 0 copies of Appellant Gerald LeRoy Barnes, II opening brief of 6 pages (Informal: Yes). Served via ECF on 10/17/2022. (IFP motion pending, briefing remains stayed.) [12565579] (KT) [Entered: 10/17/2022 04:04 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Gerald LeRoy Barnes, II motion for appointment of counsel. Deficiencies: None. [12565431] (QDL) [Entered: 10/17/2022 03:20 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Gerald LeRoy Barnes, II motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [12565427] (QDL) [Entered: 10/17/2022 03:19 PM] |
| Filing 4 Sent Appellant ( 5 ) copies of Form 4 in response to his letter of request filed on 10/12/2022. [12562392] (JR) [Entered: 10/13/2022 10:52 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Gerald LeRoy Barnes, II letter dated re: Request for copies of Form 4. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12562279] [22-35770, 22-35769, 22-35761, 22-35763, 22-35760] (QDL) [Entered: 10/13/2022 09:47 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12556034] (CKP) [Entered: 10/04/2022 04:07 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Gerald LeRoy Barnes II opening brief due 11/28/2022. [12552564] (ABT) [Entered: 09/29/2022 01:29 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
