Bryce Jackson v. Cathy Gorton, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: BRYCE JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee: CATHY GORTON, GREG MANSOFF and MULTNOMAH COUNTY
Case Number: 22-35771
Filed: September 29, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner-Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
March 28, 2024 BRYCE JACKSON V. CATHY GORTON, ET AL

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 16, 2022 Filing 14 Submitted (ECF) supplemental excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellees Cathy Gorton, Greg Mansoff and Multnomah County. Date of service: 11/16/2022. [12588405] [22-35771]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected excerpts. 11/18/2022 by SML] (Byrne, Lindsay) [Entered: 11/16/2022 08:42 AM]
November 16, 2022 Filing 13 Submitted (ECF) Answering Brief for review. Submitted by Appellees Cathy Gorton, Greg Mansoff and Multnomah County. Date of service: 11/16/2022. [12588395] [22-35771]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected brief. 11/18/2022 by SML] (Byrne, Lindsay) [Entered: 11/16/2022 08:36 AM]
November 14, 2022 Filing 12 Filed Appellant Bryce Jackson motion for pro se plaintiff to receive all documents generated. Deficiencies: None. Served on 10/22/2022. [12588106] (QDL) [Entered: 11/15/2022 04:04 PM]
November 14, 2022 Filing 11 Filed Appellant Bryce Jackson motion to complete production of Reporters Transcript at government expense. Deficiencies: None. Served on 10/22/2022. [12588097] (QDL) [Entered: 11/15/2022 04:03 PM]
November 14, 2022 Filing 10 Filed Appellant Bryce Jackson motion to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 10/22/2022. [12588090] (QDL) [Entered: 11/15/2022 04:01 PM]
October 28, 2022 Filing 9 Filed Appellant Bryce Jackson motion to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 10/20/2022. [12576911] (BJK) [Entered: 10/31/2022 01:59 PM]
October 24, 2022 Filing 8 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner completed authorization fee order. [12570845] (CKP) [Entered: 10/23/2022 04:05 PM]
October 21, 2022 Filing 7 Filed original and 6 copies of Appellant Bryce Jackson supplemental opening brief of 6 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 10/21/2022. Served by Court via CM/ECF. Filed with minor deficiencies: no certificate of service. (IFP motion pending, briefing remains stayed) [12570454] (SML) [Entered: 10/21/2022 02:36 PM]
October 21, 2022 Filing 6 Received PLRA authorization response from appellant. Dated 10/13/2022. [Case Number 22-35771: Partially Paid] [12570344] (QDL) [Entered: 10/21/2022 02:00 PM]
October 4, 2022 Filing 5 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner fee authorization form sent to prisoner. [12556049] (CKP) [Entered: 10/04/2022 04:10 PM]
October 4, 2022 Filing 4 Filed original and 0 copies of Appellant Bryce Jackson opening brief of 5 pages (Informal: No). Served on 09/24/2022. (IFP motion pending, briefing remains stayed). [12555833] (SML) [Entered: 10/04/2022 02:20 PM]
October 4, 2022 Filing 3 Filed Appellant Bryce Jackson letter re: Memorandum of law. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12555593] (QDL) [Entered: 10/04/2022 11:57 AM]
October 4, 2022 Filing 2 Filed Appellant Bryce Jackson motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 09/24/2022. [12555588] (QDL) [Entered: 10/04/2022 11:56 AM]
September 29, 2022 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Transcript ordered by 10/28/2022. Transcript due 11/28/2022. Appellant Bryce Jackson opening brief due 11/28/2022. Appellees Cathy Gorton, Greg Mansoff and Multnomah County answering brief due 12/27/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12552869] (ABT) [Entered: 09/29/2022 04:01 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Bryce Jackson v. Cathy Gorton, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: BRYCE JACKSON
Represented By: Bryce Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CATHY GORTON
Represented By: Lindsay Ann Byrne
Represented By: B. Andrew Jones
Represented By: James Gordon Rice
Represented By: Lindsay A. Byrne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: GREG MANSOFF
Represented By: Lindsay Ann Byrne
Represented By: B. Andrew Jones
Represented By: James Gordon Rice
Represented By: Lindsay A. Byrne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MULTNOMAH COUNTY
Represented By: Lindsay Ann Byrne
Represented By: B. Andrew Jones
Represented By: James Gordon Rice
Represented By: Lindsay A. Byrne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?