Longview Hills MHC, LLC v. City of Newport
Plaintiff / Appellant: LONGVIEW HILLS MHC, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF NEWPORT, an Oregon municipal corporation
Case Number: 22-35826
Filed: October 19, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 9, 2022 Filing 6 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. [12583499] (MS) [Entered: 11/09/2022 10:52 AM]
October 31, 2022 Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LK): Appellants unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 12574923-1 ]) to consolidate is granted. Nos. 22-35783 and 22-35826 are consolidated. The consolidated opening brief is due January 26, 2023. The consolidated answering brief is due February 27, 2023. The optional consolidated reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the consolidated answering brief. [12577303] [22-35783, 22-35826] (JMR) [Entered: 10/31/2022 04:34 PM]
October 28, 2022 Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant Longview Hills MHC, LLC Unopposed Motion to consolidate cases 22-35783 and 22-35826. Date of service: 10/28/2022. [12575175] [22-35826] (Robinson, Blake) [Entered: 10/28/2022 08:48 AM]
October 26, 2022 Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 10/26/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12573901]. [22-35826] (AD) [Entered: 10/26/2022 06:44 PM]
October 26, 2022 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Longview Hills MHC, LLC Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 10/26/2022. [12573892] [22-35826] (Robinson, Blake) [Entered: 10/26/2022 05:43 PM]
October 19, 2022 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Longview Hills MHC, LLC Mediation Questionnaire due on 10/26/2022. Transcript ordered by 11/17/2022. Transcript due 12/19/2022. Appellant Longview Hills MHC, LLC opening brief due 01/26/2023. Appellee City of Newport answering brief due 02/27/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12567351] (JMR) [Entered: 10/19/2022 10:53 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Longview Hills MHC, LLC v. City of Newport
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: LONGVIEW HILLS MHC, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company
Represented By: William D. Miner III
Represented By: Blake James Robinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CITY OF NEWPORT, an Oregon municipal corporation
Represented By: Robert Edward Franz Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?