Tracy Gillis v. Chandra Chapman, et al
KELLY HICKMAN, CLYDE SAIKI and OREGON DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES |
TRACY GILLIS |
CHANDRA E. CHAPMAN, in her individual capacity and as an official of the State of Oregon, JORDAN MEYER, in his individual capacity and as an official of the State of Oregon, DIANE BEECHINOR, in her individual capacity and as an official of the State of Oregon, LINDA CANIZALES, in her individual capacity and as an official of the State of Oregon, RACHEL CUDMORE, in her individual capacity and FARIBORZ PAKSERISHT, Director of the Oregon Department of Human Services in his official capacity |
22-35840 |
October 25, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 Filed (ECF) Appellee Rachel Cudmore Motion to dismiss the case. Date of service: 12/12/2022. [12608601] [22-35840] (Schroer, Janet) [Entered: 12/12/2022 04:13 PM] |
Filing 12 Filed (ECF) Appellees Chandra E. Chapman, Jordan Meyer, Diane Beechinor, Linda Canizales and Fariborz Pakserisht Motion to dismiss the case. Date of service: 12/09/2022. [12606568] [22-35840] (Fjordbeck, Denise) [Entered: 12/09/2022 10:58 AM] |
Filing 11 Filed (ECF) Appellant Tracy Gillis response to Court order dated 11/17/2022. Date of service: 12/08/2022. [12606220] [22-35840] (Vergamini, Michael) [Entered: 12/08/2022 10:23 PM] |
Filing 10 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the notice of appeal was not filed within 30 days after the district courts judgment entered on September 21, 2022. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall either move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [12590216] (WL) [Entered: 11/17/2022 01:59 PM] |
Filing 9 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. [12588240] (CL) [Entered: 11/15/2022 05:54 PM] |
Filing 8 Attorney Kenneth C. Crowley substituted by Attorney Denise Gale Fjordbeck in 22-35840. [12582027] (HH) [Entered: 11/07/2022 03:37 PM] |
Filing 7 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Denise G. Fjordbeck (Oregon Department of Justice - Appellate Division, 1162 Court Street NE, Salem, Oregon 97301) for Appellees Diane Beechinor, Linda Canizales, Chandra E. Chapman, Jordan Meyer and Fariborz Pakserisht. Substitution for Attorney Kenneth C. Crowley, Esquire for Appellees Diane Beechinor, Linda Canizales, Chandra E. Chapman, Jordan Meyer and Fariborz Pakserisht. Date of service: 11/07/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12581936] [22-35840] (Fjordbeck, Denise) [Entered: 11/07/2022 03:03 PM] |
Filing 6 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 11/15/2022, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [12579610] (BLS) [Entered: 11/03/2022 01:02 PM] |
Filing 5 Attorney Troy S. Bundy in 22-35840 substituted by Attorney Janet M. Schroer in 22-35840 [12578500] (JFF) [Entered: 11/02/2022 09:22 AM] |
Filing 4 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Janet M. Schroer (Hart Wagner LLP, 1000 SW Broadway, 20th Floor, Portland, OR 97205) for Appellee Rachel Cudmore. Substitution for Attorney Troy S. Bundy, Esquire for Appellee Rachel Cudmore. Date of service: 11/02/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12578440] [22-35840] (Schroer, Janet) [Entered: 11/02/2022 07:57 AM] |
Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 11/01/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12578408]. [22-35840] (AD) [Entered: 11/02/2022 06:44 AM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Tracy Gillis Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 11/01/2022. [12578398] [22-35840] (Vergamini, Michael) [Entered: 11/01/2022 10:15 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Tracy Gillis Mediation Questionnaire due on 11/01/2022. Transcript ordered by 11/23/2022. Transcript due 12/23/2022. Appellant Tracy Gillis opening brief due 02/01/2023. Appellees Diane Beechinor, Linda Canizales, Chandra E. Chapman, Rachel Cudmore, Jordan Meyer and Fariborz Pakserisht answering brief due 03/03/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12572383] (JMR) [Entered: 10/25/2022 11:27 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.