Tracy Gillis v. Chandra Chapman, et al
Defendant: KELLY HICKMAN, CLYDE SAIKI and OREGON DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
Plaintiff / Appellant: TRACY GILLIS
Defendant / Appellee: CHANDRA E. CHAPMAN, in her individual capacity and as an official of the State of Oregon, JORDAN MEYER, in his individual capacity and as an official of the State of Oregon, DIANE BEECHINOR, in her individual capacity and as an official of the State of Oregon, LINDA CANIZALES, in her individual capacity and as an official of the State of Oregon, RACHEL CUDMORE, in her individual capacity and FARIBORZ PAKSERISHT, Director of the Oregon Department of Human Services in his official capacity
Case Number: 22-35840
Filed: October 25, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 12, 2022 Filing 13 Filed (ECF) Appellee Rachel Cudmore Motion to dismiss the case. Date of service: 12/12/2022. [12608601] [22-35840] (Schroer, Janet) [Entered: 12/12/2022 04:13 PM]
December 9, 2022 Filing 12 Filed (ECF) Appellees Chandra E. Chapman, Jordan Meyer, Diane Beechinor, Linda Canizales and Fariborz Pakserisht Motion to dismiss the case. Date of service: 12/09/2022. [12606568] [22-35840] (Fjordbeck, Denise) [Entered: 12/09/2022 10:58 AM]
December 8, 2022 Filing 11 Filed (ECF) Appellant Tracy Gillis response to Court order dated 11/17/2022. Date of service: 12/08/2022. [12606220] [22-35840] (Vergamini, Michael) [Entered: 12/08/2022 10:23 PM]
November 17, 2022 Filing 10 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the notice of appeal was not filed within 30 days after the district courts judgment entered on September 21, 2022. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall either move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [12590216] (WL) [Entered: 11/17/2022 01:59 PM]
November 15, 2022 Filing 9 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. [12588240] (CL) [Entered: 11/15/2022 05:54 PM]
November 7, 2022 Filing 8 Attorney Kenneth C. Crowley substituted by Attorney Denise Gale Fjordbeck in 22-35840. [12582027] (HH) [Entered: 11/07/2022 03:37 PM]
November 7, 2022 Filing 7 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Denise G. Fjordbeck (Oregon Department of Justice - Appellate Division, 1162 Court Street NE, Salem, Oregon 97301) for Appellees Diane Beechinor, Linda Canizales, Chandra E. Chapman, Jordan Meyer and Fariborz Pakserisht. Substitution for Attorney Kenneth C. Crowley, Esquire for Appellees Diane Beechinor, Linda Canizales, Chandra E. Chapman, Jordan Meyer and Fariborz Pakserisht. Date of service: 11/07/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12581936] [22-35840] (Fjordbeck, Denise) [Entered: 11/07/2022 03:03 PM]
November 3, 2022 Filing 6 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 11/15/2022, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [12579610] (BLS) [Entered: 11/03/2022 01:02 PM]
November 2, 2022 Filing 5 Attorney Troy S. Bundy in 22-35840 substituted by Attorney Janet M. Schroer in 22-35840 [12578500] (JFF) [Entered: 11/02/2022 09:22 AM]
November 2, 2022 Filing 4 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Janet M. Schroer (Hart Wagner LLP, 1000 SW Broadway, 20th Floor, Portland, OR 97205) for Appellee Rachel Cudmore. Substitution for Attorney Troy S. Bundy, Esquire for Appellee Rachel Cudmore. Date of service: 11/02/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12578440] [22-35840] (Schroer, Janet) [Entered: 11/02/2022 07:57 AM]
November 2, 2022 Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 11/01/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12578408]. [22-35840] (AD) [Entered: 11/02/2022 06:44 AM]
November 1, 2022 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Tracy Gillis Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 11/01/2022. [12578398] [22-35840] (Vergamini, Michael) [Entered: 11/01/2022 10:15 PM]
October 25, 2022 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Tracy Gillis Mediation Questionnaire due on 11/01/2022. Transcript ordered by 11/23/2022. Transcript due 12/23/2022. Appellant Tracy Gillis opening brief due 02/01/2023. Appellees Diane Beechinor, Linda Canizales, Chandra E. Chapman, Rachel Cudmore, Jordan Meyer and Fariborz Pakserisht answering brief due 03/03/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12572383] (JMR) [Entered: 10/25/2022 11:27 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Tracy Gillis v. Chandra Chapman, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: TRACY GILLIS
Represented By: Michael Vergamini Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CHANDRA E. CHAPMAN, in her individual capacity and as an official of the State of Oregon
Represented By: Kenneth C. Crowley Esquire
Represented By: Denise Gale Fjordbeck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JORDAN MEYER, in his individual capacity and as an official of the State of Oregon
Represented By: Kenneth C. Crowley Esquire
Represented By: Denise Gale Fjordbeck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DIANE BEECHINOR, in her individual capacity and as an official of the State of Oregon
Represented By: Kenneth C. Crowley Esquire
Represented By: Denise Gale Fjordbeck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: LINDA CANIZALES, in her individual capacity and as an official of the State of Oregon
Represented By: Kenneth C. Crowley Esquire
Represented By: Denise Gale Fjordbeck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: RACHEL CUDMORE, in her individual capacity
Represented By: Troy S. Bundy Esquire
Represented By: Janet M. Schroer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: FARIBORZ PAKSERISHT, Director of the Oregon Department of Human Services in his official capacity
Represented By: Kenneth C. Crowley Esquire
Represented By: Denise Gale Fjordbeck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KELLY HICKMAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CLYDE SAIKI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: OREGON DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?