Lydia McCoy v. Experian Information Services, Inc., et al
| LYDIA MCCOY |
| EXPERIAN INFORMATION SERVICES, INC., EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, BH MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC, SC TIGER MANOR, LLC, LUCAS ROGERS, JAMIE LANDRY, BRITTANY BARBERA, IQ DATA INTERNATIONAL, INC., JUSTIN WHITE, MADISON TUCKER, PAUL GAMBOA, JOHN DEGRAVELLES, SCOTT JOHNSON, DOES, 1 Through 20 Inclusive and CONS, 1 Through 20 Inclusive |
| 22-35847 |
| October 26, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Lydia McCoy Motion for miscellaneous relief [PER CIR. R. 27-10 TO DISCHARGE CRIMINAL AND FRAUDULENT clerks order]. Date of service: 12/04/2022. [12601649] [22-35847] (McCoy, Lydia) [Entered: 12/04/2022 12:17 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12576236] (CKP) [Entered: 10/30/2022 10:24 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Lydia McCoy opening brief due 12/27/2022. Appellees BH Management Services, LLC, Brittany Barbera, Cons, John Degravelles, Does, Equifax Information Services, LLC, Experian Information Services, Inc., Paul Gamboa, IQ Data International, Inc., Scott Johnson, Jamie Landry, Lucas Rogers, SC Tiger Manor, LLC, Madison Tucker and Justin White answering brief due 01/23/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12573438] (JMR) [Entered: 10/26/2022 01:38 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
