Clinton Marshall v. RS 2018 Float, LLC, et al
| WELLS FARGO RAIL CORPORATION, ACF INDUSTRIES, LLC, WYOMING COLORADO RAILROAD, INC., DBA Oregon Eastern Railroad, AMERICAN RAILCAR LEASING, LLC, SMBC RAILCAR SERVICES, LLC, BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, AMERICAN RAILCAR INDUSTRIES, AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL TRANSPORT and THE GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC. |
| CLINTON O. MARSHALL |
| RS 2018 FLOAT, LLC and GREENBRIER CENTRAL, LLC |
| 22-35899 |
| November 14, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Personal Injury |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| CLINTON MARSHALL V. RS 2018 FLOAT, LLC, ET AL |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Conference w/ counsel for appellant, 01/19/2023, 11:00 a.m., Pacific Time. See order for details. [12627844] (BLS) [Entered: 01/11/2023 08:07 AM] |
| Filing 9 MEDIATION CONFERENCE RESCHEDULED - DIAL-IN AssessmentConference, 01/09/2023, 11:00 a.m. Pacific Time. (originally scheduled on 12/16/2022 ). [12612339] (VS) [Entered: 12/16/2022 10:27 AM] |
| Filing 8 Added Attorney(s) Bryan Jacobson for party(s) Appellee RS 2018 Float, LLC, in case 22-35899. [12605723] (JFF) [Entered: 12/08/2022 02:23 PM] |
| Filing 7 Added Attorney(s) Michael Benz for party(s) Appellee RS 2018 Float, LLC, in case 22-35899. [12605717] (JFF) [Entered: 12/08/2022 02:22 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Bryan E. Jacobson (CHAPMAN AND CUTLER LLP 320 South Canal Street Chicago, Illinois 60606) for Appellee RS 2018 Float, LLC. Date of service: 12/08/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12605557] [22-35899] (Jacobson, Bryan) [Entered: 12/08/2022 01:00 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Michael T. Benz (CHAPMAN AND CUTLER LLP 320 South Canal Street Chicago, Illinois 60606) for Appellee RS 2018 Float, LLC. Date of service: 12/08/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12605551] [22-35899] (Benz, Michael) [Entered: 12/08/2022 12:56 PM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN AssessmentConference, 12/16/2022, 12:00 p.m., PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12605384] (VS) [Entered: 12/08/2022 11:15 AM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 11/21/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12593374]. [22-35899] (AD) [Entered: 11/21/2022 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Clinton O. Marshall Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 11/21/2022. [12593351] [22-35899] (Dahab, Nadia) [Entered: 11/21/2022 05:54 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Clinton O. Marshall Mediation Questionnaire due on 11/21/2022. Transcript ordered by 12/12/2022. Transcript due 01/09/2023. Appellant Clinton O. Marshall opening brief due 02/21/2023. Appellees Greenbrier Central, LLC and RS 2018 Float, LLC answering brief due 03/23/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12586201] (JBS) [Entered: 11/14/2022 12:10 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
