Renardo Robertson, et al v. Catholic Community Services of Western Washington, et al
| RENARDO D. ROBERTSON and DONNA ROBERTSON, individually and their marital community |
| CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF WESTERN WASHINGTON, a Washington public benefit corporation, D. MICHAEL REILLY, Attorney, Lane Powell PC, SHIRLEY S. LOU-MAGNUSON, Attorney, Lane Powell PC, RODNEY R. MOODY, Attorney and RODNEY R MOODY, Attorney |
| 22-35965 |
| November 21, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Fraud |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| RENARDO ROBERTSON, ET AL V. CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF WESTERN WASHINGTON, ET AL |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Copy of letter received from Appellant Mr. Renardo D. Robertson addressed to Director Christopher Wray re: fraud upon the Western Washington District Court the white collar crime includes officers of the court tampering with cm/ecf online filing system, altered, concealment, and the unauthorized removal of documents from the court. [12629829] (RL) [Entered: 01/12/2023 05:03 PM] |
| Filing 8 Streamlined request [7] by Appellant Mr. Renardo D. Robertson to extend time to file the brief is approved FOR ALL APPELLANTS. Amended briefing schedule: Appellants Donna Robertson and Renardo D. Robertson opening brief due 02/16/2023. Appellees Catholic Community Services of Western Washington, Shirley S. Lou-Magnuson, Rodney R Moody and D. Michael Reilly answering brief due 03/20/2023. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12621852] (BG) [Entered: 01/03/2023 03:21 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellant Mr. Renardo D. Robertson. New requested due date is 02/17/2023. [12621813] [22-35965] (Robertson, Renardo) [Entered: 01/03/2023 03:06 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: TAH): The appellants motion for oral argument (Docket Entry No. [ # 4 ]) and any future related responses are referred to the panel assigned to consider the merits of this case for whatever consideration the panel deems appropriate. The appellants motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 5 ]) to strike the motions filed at Docket Entry Nos. 2 and 3 is granted. The Clerk will strike Docket Entry Nos. [2] and [3]. The briefing schedule is unchanged. The opening brief is due January 17, 2023. The answering brief is due February 16, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12598347] (JBS) [Entered: 11/29/2022 03:17 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Renardo D. Robertson Unopposed Motion to strike whole of Motion to Strike or Remove Docket Entries 2 and 3 the docket numbers at the tops of each fact exhibit are illegible and can't be cited. Dkt Entry 4 corrected the discrepancy with clear and legible Dkt numbers to be viewed by panel judges and attorneys. Date of service: 11/29/2022. [12597623] [22-35965] (Robertson, Renardo) [Entered: 11/29/2022 09:06 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Renardo D. Robertson Unopposed Motion for miscellaneous relief [Do Not Delete, Correct Copy of Motion for ORAL ARGUMENT pursuant FRAP 34, the direct evidence of material facts presented to the Panel are included in Exhibits 1 through 14: Corrected Copy]. Date of service: 11/25/2022. [12595849] [22-35965] (Robertson, Renardo) [Entered: 11/25/2022 02:03 PM] |
| Filing 3 STRICKEN PER ORDER [ # 6 ] Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Renardo D. Robertson Unopposed Motion for miscellaneous relief [Second submission of Motion for ORAL ARGUMENT, the initial attachments 61 through 61-7 have already been tampered with are the docket numbers at the top of each page has been deliberately mutilated. We are requesting a judges review of 11/23/2022 docs.]. Date of service: 11/24/2022. [12595528] [22-35965] (Robertson, Renardo) [Entered: 11/24/2022 09:14 PM] |
| Filing 2 STRICKEN PER ORDER [ # 6 ] Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Renardo D. Robertson Unopposed Motion for miscellaneous relief [APPELLANT REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT -PURSUANT 34(a)(1)(2)]. Date of service: 11/23/2022. [12595459] [22-35965] (Robertson, Renardo) [Entered: 11/23/2022 04:48 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANTS. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Donna Robertson and Renardo D. Robertson opening brief due 01/17/2023. Appellees Catholic Community Services of Western Washington, Shirley S. Lou-Magnuson, Rodney R. Moody and D. Michael Reilly answering brief due 02/16/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12592984] (JMR) [Entered: 11/21/2022 03:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Renardo Robertson, et al v. Catholic Community Services of Western Washington, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: RENARDO D. ROBERTSON | |
| Represented By: | Renardo D. Robertson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: DONNA ROBERTSON, individually and their marital community | |
| Represented By: | Donna Robertson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF WESTERN WASHINGTON, a Washington public benefit corporation | |
| Represented By: | William J. Crowley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: D. MICHAEL REILLY, Attorney, Lane Powell PC | |
| Represented By: | Charles Huber Esquire |
| Represented By: | Rachel Reynolds |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: SHIRLEY S. LOU-MAGNUSON, Attorney, Lane Powell PC | |
| Represented By: | Charles Huber Esquire |
| Represented By: | Rachel Reynolds |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: RODNEY R. MOODY, Attorney | |
| Represented By: | Rodney R. Moody |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: RODNEY R MOODY, Attorney | |
| Represented By: | Rodney R. Moody |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
