Cottonwood Environmental Law Center v. Deb Haaland, et al
| COTTONWOOD ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER |
| DEB HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, CAM SHOLLY, in his official capacity as Park Superintendent, Yellowstone National Park, LEANNE MARTEN, in her official capacity as Regional Forester, U.S. Forest Service, NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, U.S. FOREST SERVICE and USDA-ANIMAL & PLANT HEALTH INSPECTION SERVICE |
| 22-35976 |
| November 23, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Environmental Matters |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Conference, 01/30/2023, 1:30 p.m. Pacific Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court is amended as follows: Appellant Cottonwood Environmental Law Center opening brief due 03/01/2023. Appellees Deb Haaland, Leanne Marten, National Park Service, Cam Sholly, U.S. Forest Service and USDA-Animal & Plant Health Inspection Service answering brief due 03/31/2023. Appellant optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. See order for details. [12616379] (CL) [Entered: 12/22/2022 10:49 AM] |
| Filing 6 Attorney Mark Steger Smith substituted by Attorney Thekla Hansen-Young in 22-35976. [12611667] (HH) [Entered: 12/15/2022 01:41 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Thekla Hansen-Young (US Dept of Justice, PO Box 7415, Ben Franklin Station, Washington DC 20044) for Appellees Deb Haaland, Leanne Marten, National Park Service, Cam Sholly, U.S. Forest Service and USDA-Animal & Plant Health Inspection Service. Substitution for Attorney Mark Steger Smith, Esquire for Appellees Deb Haaland, Leanne Marten, National Park Service, Cam Sholly, U.S. Forest Service and USDA-Animal & Plant Health Inspection Service. Date of service: 12/15/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12611642] [22-35976] (Hansen-Young, Thekla) [Entered: 12/15/2022 01:25 PM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 12/21/2022, 10:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12600149] (CL) [Entered: 12/01/2022 12:31 PM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 11/23/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12595501]. [22-35976] (AD) [Entered: 11/23/2022 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Cottonwood Environmental Law Center Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 11/23/2022. [12595316] [22-35976] (Meyer, John) [Entered: 11/23/2022 03:07 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Cottonwood Environmental Law Center Mediation Questionnaire due on 11/30/2022. Appellant Cottonwood Environmental Law Center opening brief due 01/17/2023. Appellees Deb Haaland, Leanne Marten, National Park Service, Cam Sholly, U.S. Forest Service and USDA-Animal & Plant Health Inspection Service answering brief due 02/16/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12594841] (JBS) [Entered: 11/23/2022 10:23 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
