Shari Cane v. City of Livingston, et al
Defendant: COREY O'NEILL, in his official and individual capacities, STEVE KUNNATH, in his official and individual capacitie, JOHN DOE, in his official and individual capacities and JAY PORTEEN, in his official and individual capacities
Plaintiff / Appellee: SHARI CANE
Defendant / Appellant: CITY OF LIVINGSTON, Montana
Case Number: 22-35995
Filed: November 29, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 17, 2023 Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellant Shari Cane in 22-35936, Appellee Shari Cane in 22-35994, 22-35995 Unopposed Motion to extend the time to file appellant designation of reporters transcript until 02/17/2023. Date of service: 01/17/2023. [12631671] [22-35936, 22-35994, 22-35995] (Rebsom, Jami) [Entered: 01/17/2023 01:31 PM]
December 23, 2022 Filing 6 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 01/18/2023, 11:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12617474] [22-35936, 22-35994, 22-35995] (CL) [Entered: 12/23/2022 04:15 PM]
December 6, 2022 Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 12/06/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12603452]. [22-35995] (AD) [Entered: 12/06/2022 12:44 PM]
December 6, 2022 Filing 4 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 12/06/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12603447]. [22-35995] (AD) [Entered: 12/06/2022 12:44 PM]
December 6, 2022 Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Corey O'Neill in 22-35994, Appellee Corey O'Neill in 22-35936 Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 12/06/2022. [12602972] [22-35994, 22-35936, 22-35995] (Krogh, Harlan) [Entered: 12/06/2022 08:29 AM]
December 6, 2022 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant City of Livingston in 22-35995 Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 12/06/2022. [12602957] [22-35995, 22-35936, 22-35994] (Bancroft, Thomas) [Entered: 12/06/2022 08:03 AM]
November 29, 2022 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. Setting cross-appeal briefing schedule as follows: Appellants Corey O'Neill and City of Livingston Mediation Questionnaire due on 12/06/2022. First cross appeal brief due 02/24/2023 for Shari Cane. Second brief on cross appeal due 03/27/2023 for City of Livingston, Steve Kunnath, Corey O'Neill and Jay Porteen. Third brief on cross appeal due 04/26/2023 for Shari Cane. Optional cross appeal reply brief is due within 21 days of service of third brief on cross appeal. [12597883] [22-35994, 22-35936, 22-35995] (JBS) [Entered: 11/29/2022 11:22 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Shari Cane v. City of Livingston, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: SHARI CANE
Represented By: Jami Rebsom
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: CITY OF LIVINGSTON, Montana
Represented By: Thomas Bancroft
Represented By: Randall G. Nelson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COREY O'NEILL, in his official and individual capacities
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STEVE KUNNATH, in his official and individual capacitie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN DOE, in his official and individual capacities
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JAY PORTEEN, in his official and individual capacities
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?