Daniel Boudette v. Tammy Oskerson, et al
| DANIEL BOUDETTE |
| TAMMY OSKERSON, ADAM OWENS, GREGORY G. COSTANZA, GRANITE PEAK LAW, PLLC and UNKNOWN NAMED DEFENDANTS, A-Z |
| 22-36003 |
| December 2, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Civil (Rico) |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| DANIEL BOUDETTE V. TAMMY OSKERSON, ET AL |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Received Appellant Daniel Boudette Certificate of Service for Paper Filing. [12614914] (NAC) [Entered: 12/20/2022 12:18 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Daniel Boudette motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [12614181] (NAC) [Entered: 12/19/2022 03:09 PM] |
| Filing 3 Received Appellant Daniel Boudette copy of Transcript order form. [12614178] (NAC) [Entered: 12/19/2022 03:08 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12600991] (CKP) [Entered: 12/02/2022 12:41 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Transcript ordered by 01/03/2023. Transcript due 01/30/2023. Appellant Daniel Boudette opening brief due 03/13/2023. Appellees Gregory G. Costanza, Granite Peak Law, PLLC, Tammy Oskerson, Adam Owens and Unknown Named Defendants answering brief due 04/10/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12600814] (JMR) [Entered: 12/02/2022 10:41 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
