Roland Ma v. Esther Densmore, et al
| ROLAND MA |
| ESTHER PARK DENSMORE, Administrator of Washington Care Services and WASHINGTON CARE SERVICES, a domestic non-profit 501(c)(3) corporation, Washington |
| WALDEN UNIVERSITY LLC, a foreign limited liability company |
| 22-36030 |
| December 15, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Civil Rights - Education |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [12650834] (CKP) [Entered: 02/10/2023 12:45 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Mr. Roland Ma motion adding party defendant. Deficiencies: None. [12614290] (HH) [Entered: 12/19/2022 03:46 PM] |
| Filing 3 Attorney Jessica Ann Beers substituted by Attorney Amanda K. Thorsvig in 22-36030. [12612457] (HH) [Entered: 12/16/2022 11:40 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Amanda K. Thorsvig (FAVROS Law, 1301 A. St., Suite 900, Tacoma, WA 98402) for Appellees Esther Park Densmore and Washington Care Services. Substitution for Attorney Ms. Jessica Ann Beers for Appellees Esther Park Densmore and Washington Care Services. Date of service: 12/16/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12612402] [22-36030] (Thorsvig, Amanda) [Entered: 12/16/2022 11:10 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Roland Ma opening brief due 02/13/2023. Appellees Esther Park Densmore, Walden University LLC and Washington Care Services answering brief due 03/15/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12611800] (JBS) [Entered: 12/15/2022 03:12 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Roland Ma v. Esther Densmore, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: ROLAND MA | |
| Represented By: | Roland Ma |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: ESTHER PARK DENSMORE, Administrator of Washington Care Services | |
| Represented By: | Amanda K. Thorsvig |
| Represented By: | Ketia Berry Wick |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: WASHINGTON CARE SERVICES, a domestic non-profit 501(c)(3) corporation, Washington | |
| Represented By: | Amanda K. Thorsvig |
| Represented By: | Ketia Berry Wick |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| 3rd party defendant: WALDEN UNIVERSITY LLC, a foreign limited liability company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
