Adnand Rathod, et al v. USA, et al
PROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES, a Washington corporation, DBA Providence Hospital of Everett, DBA Providence Regional Medical Center Everett, DANA BLACKHAM, MD, OBSTETRIX MEDICAL GROUP OF WASHINGTON, INC. PS and DOES, John/Jane 1-50 |
ADNAND RATHOD, AESHA RATHOD and JOSHUA BROTHERS, as Guardian ad Litem for minor P.R. |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
22-36045 |
December 22, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Medical Malpractice |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
ANAND RATHOD, ET AL V. USA, ET AL |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. [12655588] (VS) [Entered: 02/17/2023 09:37 AM] |
Filing 9 Streamlined request [8] by Appellants Joshua Brothers, Adnand Rathod and Aesha Rathod to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellants Joshua Brothers, Adnand Rathod and Aesha Rathod opening brief due 03/23/2023. Appellee United States of America answering brief due 04/24/2023. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12653370] (BG) [Entered: 02/15/2023 07:20 AM] |
Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellants Joshua Brothers, Adnand Rathod and Aesha Rathod. New requested due date is 03/23/2023. [12653097] [22-36045] (Manca, Gary) [Entered: 02/14/2023 03:02 PM] |
Filing 7 MEDIATION STATUS REPORT DUE - 02/14/2023. See order for details. [12642989] (VS) [Entered: 01/31/2023 10:59 AM] |
Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellants Joshua Brothers, Adnand Rathod and Aesha Rathod Motion for miscellaneous relief [Motion to Correct Representation Statement]. Date of service: 01/20/2023. [12634882] [22-36045] (Manca, Gary) [Entered: 01/20/2023 01:14 PM] |
Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellants Joshua Brothers, Adnand Rathod and Aesha Rathod Motion for miscellaneous relief [Motion to Change Case Name]. Date of service: 01/20/2023. [12634764] [22-36045] (Manca, Gary) [Entered: 01/20/2023 11:45 AM] |
Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN AssessmentConference, 01/31/2023, 10:00 a.m., PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12633472] (VS) [Entered: 01/19/2023 08:37 AM] |
Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 12/27/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12618261]. [22-36045] (AD) [Entered: 12/27/2022 12:44 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellants Joshua Brothers, Adnand Rathod and Aesha Rathod Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 12/27/2022. [12617892] [22-36045] (Manca, Gary) [Entered: 12/27/2022 10:08 AM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Joshua Brothers, Adnand Rathod and Aesha Rathod Mediation Questionnaire due on 12/29/2022. Appellants Joshua Brothers, Adnand Rathod and Aesha Rathod opening brief due 02/21/2023. Appellee United States of America answering brief due 03/23/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12616437] (JBS) [Entered: 12/22/2022 11:18 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.