Jody Carr v. David Nye, et al
| JODY R.O. CARR |
| DAVID C. NYE, Judge, B. LYNN WINMILL, Judge, JOSH TEWALT, Director IDOC, MARK KUBINSKI, IDOC Official, AMANDA GENTRY, RACHAEL ALTIG, BARNEY, MCKEY, NICODEMUS and CHRISTENSEN |
| 22-36052 |
| December 22, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Filed Appellant Jody R.O. Carr addendum to mtoion to proceed in forma pauperis. Dated 01/27/2023. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12640665] (RL) [Entered: 01/27/2023 12:14 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed original and 0 copies of Appellant Jody R.O. Carr opening brief of 9 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 01/25/2023. (motions for IFP and to appoint counsel pending) [12638019] (SML) [Entered: 01/25/2023 09:53 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Jody R.O. Carr motion to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 01/25/2023. [12638013] (SML) [Entered: 01/25/2023 09:50 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Jody R.O. Carr motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 01/25/2023. [12638004] (SML) [Entered: 01/25/2023 09:45 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12625943] (CKP) [Entered: 01/09/2023 12:49 PM] |
| Filing 2 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 22-36052: Due] ). [12625941] (CKP) [Entered: 01/09/2023 12:47 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Jody R.O. Carr opening brief due 02/23/2023. [12617349] (RT) [Entered: 12/23/2022 01:42 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
