Aimee Bikundwa v. Schadrack Ruyenzi
AIMEE KIDOGI BIKUNDWA |
SCHADRACK RUYENZI |
22-36060 |
December 28, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other Statutory Actions |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12624747] (CKP) [Entered: 01/06/2023 12:32 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Schadrack Ruyenzi opening brief due 02/28/2023. Appellee Aimee Kidogi Bikundwa answering brief due 03/28/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12619125] (RT) [Entered: 12/28/2022 11:25 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Aimee Bikundwa v. Schadrack Ruyenzi | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: AIMEE KIDOGI BIKUNDWA | |
Represented By: | Jose Dino Vasquez |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: SCHADRACK RUYENZI | |
Represented By: | Schadrack Ruyenzi |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.