Kim v. Garland
| JUNG WOO KIM |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 22-372 |
| February 28, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER FILED. Petitioners unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 12) for voluntary dismissal of this petition for review is granted. This petition is dismissed. See Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). This order served on the agency acts as and for the mandate of this court. [Entered: 07/20/2022 04:35:00 PM]
|
| Filing 12 MOTION to voluntarily dismiss filed by Petitioner Jung Woo Kim. [Entered: 07/15/2022 01:33:00 PM] |
| Filing 11 STATUS REPORT (as required by Court order) filed by Petitioner Jung Woo Kim. [Entered: 07/15/2022 01:30:00 PM] |
|
Filing 10
ORDER FILED. Petitioners unopposed motion (Docket Entry Nos. 8 and 9) to stay appellate proceedings is granted. The previously established briefing schedule is vacated. Appellate proceedings are stayed pending issuance of the mandate in United States v. Bastide-Hernandez, No. 19-30006, or until further order of the court. Petitioner shall file a status report on July 18, 2022 and every 90 days thereafter while United States v. Bastide-Hernandez remains pending. Petitioner shall notify the court by filing a status report within 7 days of the issuance of the mandate in United States v. Bastide-Hernandez. Failure to file a status report may terminate the stay of appellate proceedings. The briefing schedule will be reset in a future order. [Entered: 04/25/2022 01:37:00 PM]--[COURT UPDATE: Removed incorrect PDF.] [Edited: 04/25/2022 01:44:00 PM]
|
| Filing 9 SUPPLEMENT to Motion to Hold in Abeyance (entry 8) filed by Petitioner Jung Woo Kim. [Entered: 04/19/2022 12:06:00 PM] |
| Filing 8 MOTION to hold case in abeyance filed by Petitioner Jung Woo Kim. [Entered: 04/19/2022 11:57:00 AM] |
| Filing 7 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed. [Entered: 03/25/2022 06:25:00 AM] |
| Filing 6 ADDED John Frederick Stanton for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 03/01/2022 08:13:00 AM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by John Frederick Stanton for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 03/01/2022 07:12:00 AM] |
| Filing 4 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 4/4/2022, Petitioner Opening Brief due 6/3/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 8/2/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 02/28/2022 04:32:00 PM] |
| Filing 3 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 2/28/2022. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 22-372 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 02/28/2022 04:31:00 PM] |
| Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 2/1/2022. [Entered: 02/28/2022 03:32:00 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 02/28/2022 03:31:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Kim v. Garland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: JUNG WOO KIM | |
| Represented By: | Ms. Megan A. Brewer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | OIL |
| Represented By: | Mr. John Frederick Stanton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
