Cardenas-Rios v. Garland
| SAMUEL CARDENAS-RIOS |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 22-433 |
| March 7, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER FILED. Petitioner has failed to file the opening brief in this case. Pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1, this case is dismissed for failure to prosecute. This order will be served on the agency and will become the mandate of the court in 21 days. [Entered: 10/13/2022 04:22 PM]
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER FILED. Barry G. SILVERMAN, Daniel P. COLLINS The court, in its discretion, denies the motion for appointment of pro bono counsel (Docket Entry No. 4). The motion for a stay of removal (Docket Entry No. 2) is denied. See Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418 (2009); Leiva-Perez v. Holder, 640 F.3d 962 (9th Cir. 2011). The temporary stay of removal is terminated. If petitioner is removed or otherwise has a change of address, petitioner must notify this court of the new address. Otherwise, the petition may be dismissed. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The opening brief is due September 13, 2022. The answering brief is due November 14, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 07/14/2022 12:20:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER FILED. This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions. [Entered: 06/10/2022 02:17:00 PM]
|
| Filing 13 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - This immigration petition has been referred to the Ninth Circuit Mediation Program. See Fed. R. App. P. 33 and Ninth Cir. R. 33-1. The court has scheduled a dial-in telephone assessment conference with counsel and Circuit Mediator Jonathan Westen at the date and time indicated above to explore settlement potential. Each attorney on the attached list of participants will receive an email with dial-in information. If there are any changes or additions to the list, please notify the Mediation Office at mediation@ca9.uscourts.gov. Also, if counsel has an unavoidable scheduling conflict, please notify Circuit Mediator Jonathan Westen immediately by email (Jonathan_Westen@ca9.uscourts.gov) and copy all counsel on any such communications. All emails should include the Ninth Circuit case name and number in the subject line. All discussions that take place in the context of the assessment conference are confidential. See Circuit Rule 33-1. For more detailed information about the assessment conference, confidentiality, and the Mediation Program and its procedures generally, please see the attachment to this order and the Mediation Program web site: www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation. [Entered: 05/23/2022 04:42:00 PM] |
| Filing 12 OPPOSITION to motion to stay removal filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 05/02/2022 05:51:00 PM] |
| Filing 11 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed. [Entered: 04/28/2022 09:19:00 AM] |
| Filing 10 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed. [Entered: 03/23/2022 12:40:00 PM] |
|
Filing 9
ORDER FILED. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. 3) is granted. The Clerk will amend the docket to reflect this status. The certified administrative record remains due April 11, 2022. The response to the motion for a stay of removal remains due May 2, 2022. Briefing is stayed pending resolution of the motion for appointment of counsel. See 9th Cir. R. 27-11. [Entered: 03/09/2022 01:02:00 PM]
|
| Filing 8 ADDED Aaron Nelson for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 03/08/2022 08:46:00 AM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Aaron Nelson for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 03/08/2022 06:14:00 AM] |
| Filing 6 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 4/11/2022, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 5/2/2022, Petitioner Opening Brief due 6/10/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 8/9/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 03/07/2022 03:20:00 PM] |
| Filing 5 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 3/7/2022. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 22-433 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 03/07/2022 03:18:00 PM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 03/07/2022 02:59:00 PM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 03/07/2022 02:58:00 PM] |
| Filing 2 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 03/07/2022 02:58:00 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 03/07/2022 02:57:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Cardenas-Rios v. Garland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: SAMUEL CARDENAS-RIOS | |
| Represented By: | Samuel Cardenas-Rios |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | Mr. Aaron Nelson |
| Represented By: | OIL |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
