USA v. Vicente Morales
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| VICENTE IGNACIO MORALES, AKA Chente |
| 22-50213 |
| September 23, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Criminal Justice Act electronic voucher created. (Counsel: Mrs. Alyssa D. Bell for Vicente Ignacio Morales) [12553469] (AEW) [Entered: 09/30/2022 12:56 PM] |
| Filing 5 Received email notice of CJA counsel of record appointment. Attorney(s) Alyssa D. Bell for party(s) Appellant Vicente Ignacio Morales, in case 22-50213. [12551595] (DJV) [Entered: 09/28/2022 01:25 PM] |
| Filing 4 Terminated Marri Derby for Vicente Ignacio Morales in 22-50213 [12551415] (ABT) [Entered: 09/28/2022 11:47 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed order (Appellate Commissioner): The motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 2 ]) of appellants appointed counsel, Marri Derby, Esq., to withdraw as counsel of record and to appoint new counsel, is granted. The Clerk will electronically serve this order on the appointing authority for the Central District of California, who will locate appointed counsel. The appointing authority is requested to send notification of the name, address, and telephone number of appointed counsel to the Clerk of this court at counselappointments@ca9.uscourts.gov within 14 days of locating counsel. Appellant must designate the reporters transcript by October 31, 2022. The transcript is due November 30, 2022. The opening brief and excerpts of record are due January 9, 2023; the answering brief is due February 8, 2023; and the optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. The Clerk will serve this order on former counsel and appellant individually: Reg. No. 79922-112, MDC Los Angeles, P.O. Box 531500, Los Angeles, CA 90053. [12551410] (ABT) [Entered: 09/28/2022 11:44 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Vicente Ignacio Morales motion. Attorney(s) Attorney Ms. Marri Derby, Esquire for Appellant Vicente Ignacio Morales motion to withdraw as counsel. Date of service: 09/26/2022. [12548702] [22-50213] (Derby, Marri) [Entered: 09/26/2022 03:20 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. Reporters Transcript required: Yes. Sentence imposed: 120 MONTHS. Transcript ordered by 10/14/2022. Transcript due 11/14/2022. Appellant briefs and excerpts due by 12/23/2022 for Vicente Ignacio Morales. Appellee brief due 01/23/2023 for United States of America. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12548221] (ABT) [Entered: 09/23/2022 03:15 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Vicente Morales | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Bram M. Alden |
| Represented By: | Laura Alexander |
| Represented By: | Kellye Ng-McCullough |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: VICENTE IGNACIO MORALES, AKA Chente | |
| Represented By: | Alyssa D. Bell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
