AECOM v. Zurich American Insurance Co
| AECOM, a Delaware corporation |
| ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a New York corporation |
| 22-55092 |
| January 19, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Insurance |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| AECOM V. ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE CO. |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. [12379530] (BLS) [Entered: 02/24/2022 04:17 PM] |
| Filing 9 Deleted Incorrect Entry. Meant for case 22-15181. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Original Text: Received copy of District Court order filed on 02/08/2022. Revoking IFP Status [12363710] (NAC) [Entered: 02/08/2022 10:19 AM] |
| Filing 8 Added Attorney(s) Patrick Florian Hofer for party(s) Appellee Zurich American Insurance Company, in case 22-55092. [12363701] (NAC) [Entered: 02/08/2022 10:17 AM] |
| Filing 7 Added Attorney(s) Timothy A. Carroll for party(s) Appellee Zurich American Insurance Company, in case 22-55092. [12363697] (NAC) [Entered: 02/08/2022 10:16 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Timothy A. Carroll (Clyde & Co US LLP, 340 Mt. Kemble Ave., Suite 300, Morristown, NJ 07960) for Appellee Zurich American Insurance Company. Date of service: 02/08/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12363660] [22-55092] (Carroll, Timothy) [Entered: 02/08/2022 09:59 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Patrick Florian Hofer (Clyde & Co US LLP, 1775 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20006) for Appellee Zurich American Insurance Company. Date of service: 02/08/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12363599] [22-55092] (Hofer, Patrick) [Entered: 02/08/2022 09:36 AM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 02/21/2022, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [12356600] (BLS) [Entered: 01/31/2022 05:20 PM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 01/26/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12352757]. [22-55092] (AD) [Entered: 01/26/2022 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant AECOM Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 01/26/2022. [12352612] [22-55092] (Mohr, Jacquelyn) [Entered: 01/26/2022 04:14 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant AECOM Mediation Questionnaire due on 01/26/2022. Transcript ordered by 02/17/2022. Transcript due 03/21/2022. Appellant AECOM opening brief due 04/28/2022. Appellee Zurich American Insurance Company answering brief due 05/31/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12344739] (JMR) [Entered: 01/19/2022 01:41 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
