Michael Hicks v. D. Clayton, et al
| MICHAEL JAMES HICKS |
| D. CLAYTON, M.D., P. SHAKIBA, M.D., S. ROBERTS, Dr. CME, M. GLYNN, CEO and S. GATES, Chief, Health Care Appeals |
| 22-55096 |
| January 20, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: DA) : Appellants motion for voluntary dismissal of this appeal (Docket Entry No. [ # 5 ] ) is granted. This appeal is dismissed. See Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). All other pending motions are denied as moot. This order served on the district court shall act as and for the mandate of this court. [12367676] (RT) [Entered: 02/11/2022 11:25 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Michael James Hicks motion to dismiss the appeal. Deficiencies: None. [12366296] (NAC) [Entered: 02/10/2022 11:30 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed original and 0 copies of Appellant Michael James Hicks opening brief of 10 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 01/31/2022. (IFP motion pending, briefing remains stayed) [12361448] (LA) [Entered: 02/04/2022 03:23 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Michael James Hicks motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None [12361415] (NAC) [Entered: 02/04/2022 03:08 PM] |
| Filing 2 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court. [12349081] (NAC) [Entered: 01/24/2022 02:09 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT & NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Michael James Hicks opening brief due 03/15/2022. [12345702] (OC) [Entered: 01/20/2022 10:50 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
