Uloma Ekpete v. Nancy Pelosi, et al
| ULOMA EKPETE and ULOMA STACY EKPETE |
| NANCY PELOSI, House Speaker, DEMOCRATIC PARTY LEADERSHIP, PROSPECT MEDICAL HOLDINGS, INC., LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, CALIFORNIA LABOR UNION and STEVE HARVEY, Judge |
| 22-55118 |
| January 31, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. Amount Paid: USD 505.00. Date paid: 03/22/2022. [12401697] (BY) [Entered: 03/22/2022 01:10 PM] |
| Filing 13 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MF): Appellants motion for an extension of time to comply with the February 3, 2022 order is granted [ # 6 ]. Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant must comply with the February 3, 2022 order. If appellant fails to comply with this order, the appeal will be dismissed by the Clerk for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The previously established briefing schedule remains in effect. [12390684] (CKP) [Entered: 03/09/2022 02:29 PM] |
| Filing 12 Filed (ECF) Appellant Doctor Uloma Stacy Ekpete Correspondence: Update. Date of service: 03/08/2022. [12389899] [22-55118] --[COURT UPDATE: Updated docket text to reflect correct ECF filing type. 03/09/2022 by SLM] (Ekpete, Uloma) [Entered: 03/08/2022 07:46 PM] |
| Filing 11 Filed (ECF) Appellant Doctor Uloma Stacy Ekpete Correspondence: Update. Date of service: 03/07/2022. [12387958] [22-55118] --[COURT UPDATE: Updated docket text to reflect correct ECF filing type. 3/7/2022 by TYL] (Ekpete, Uloma) [Entered: 03/07/2022 12:24 PM] |
| Filing 10 Filed (ECF) Appellant Doctor Uloma Stacy Ekpete Correspondence: Update. Date of service: 03/04/2022. [12387131] [22-55118] --[COURT UPDATE: Updated docket text to reflect correct ECF filing type. 3/7/2022 by TYL] (Ekpete, Uloma) [Entered: 03/04/2022 09:00 PM] |
| Filing 9 Received copy of motion filed in district court re: request to eot to file noa. Motion filed by Appellant Doctor Uloma Stacy Ekpete. [12382043] (DJV) [Entered: 02/28/2022 02:16 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed Appellant Doctor Uloma Stacy Ekpete letter dated 02/25/2022 re: addendum to DE 7 "edited". Paper filing deficiency: None. [12381621] (DJV) [Entered: 02/28/2022 11:26 AM] |
| Filing 7 Filed Appellant Uloma Ekpete response to for docket fee due. Served on 02/25/2022. [12381194] (DJV) [Entered: 02/28/2022 06:57 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Uloma Ekpete motion to extend time to comply with the order dated 02/03/2022. Deficiencies: None. Served on 02/25/2022. [12381193] (DJV) [Entered: 02/28/2022 06:54 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12359844] (CKP) [Entered: 02/03/2022 10:26 AM] |
| Filing 4 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 22-55118: Due] ). [12359840] (CKP) [Entered: 02/03/2022 10:25 AM] |
| Filing 3 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 22-55118: IFP Pending In DC] ). [12359003] (DJV) [Entered: 02/02/2022 02:25 PM] |
| Filing 2 Received copy of motion filed in district court re: IFP. Motion filed by Appellant Uloma Ekpete; dated 1/26/22. [12359001] (DJV) [Entered: 02/02/2022 02:24 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Uloma Ekpete opening brief due 04/04/2022. Appellees California Labor Union, Democratic Party Leadership, Steve Harvey, Loma Linda University School of Public Health, Nancy Pelosi and Prospect Medical Holdings, Inc. answering brief due 05/04/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12356551] (RT) [Entered: 01/31/2022 04:55 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
