Discount Electronics, Inc., et al v. Wesco Insurance Company, et al
Defendant: DOES, 1 through 50, inclusive
Plaintiff / Appellant: DISCOUNT ELECTRONICS, INC., a California Corporation, JOHNS SHOE REPAIR and OPTICAL CONNECTION ENTITY, INC., a California Corporation
Defendant / Appellee: WESCO INSURANCE COMPANY
Case Number: 22-55133
Filed: February 3, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Insurance

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
February 15, 2023 DISCOUNT ELECTRONICS, INC., ET AL V. WESCO INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2022 Filing 12 Streamlined request [11] by Appellants Discount Electronics, Inc., Johns Shoe Repair and Optical Connection Entity, Inc. to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellants Discount Electronics, Inc., Johns Shoe Repair and Optical Connection Entity, Inc. opening brief due 05/04/2022. Appellee Wesco Insurance Company answering brief due 06/03/2022. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12410333] (BG) [Entered: 03/31/2022 05:56 PM]
March 31, 2022 Filing 11 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellants Discount Electronics, Inc., Johns Shoe Repair and Optical Connection Entity, Inc.. New requested due date is 05/04/2022. [12410151] [22-55133] (Keusseyan, Eileen) [Entered: 03/31/2022 03:37 PM]
March 3, 2022 Filing 10 Added Attorney(s) Kimberly Ann Hartman, Mark J. Sobczak for party(s) Appellee Wesco Insurance Company, in case 22-55133. [12385071] (RR) [Entered: 03/03/2022 09:43 AM]
March 3, 2022 Filing 9 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Mark J. Sobczak (Nicolaides Fink Thorpe Michaelides Sullivan LLP, 10 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2100, Chicago, IL 60606) for Appellee Wesco Insurance Company. Date of service: 03/03/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12384935] [22-55133] (Sobczak, Mark) [Entered: 03/03/2022 06:35 AM]
March 3, 2022 Filing 8 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Kimberly A. Hartman (Nicolaides Fink Thorpe Michaelides Sullivan LLP 10 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2100, Chicago, IL 60606) for Appellee Wesco Insurance Company. Date of service: 03/03/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12384932] [22-55133] (Hartman, Kimberly) [Entered: 03/03/2022 06:13 AM]
March 1, 2022 Filing 7 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. All further inquiries regarding this appeal, including request for extensions of time, should be directed to the Clerk's Office. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. [12382855] (VS) [Entered: 03/01/2022 10:57 AM]
February 15, 2022 Filing 6 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 03/01/2022, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [12371108] (VS) [Entered: 02/15/2022 02:39 PM]
February 10, 2022 Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 02/10/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12367180]. [22-55133] (AD) [Entered: 02/10/2022 06:44 PM]
February 10, 2022 Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellee Wesco Insurance Company Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 02/10/2022. [12366522] [22-55133] (Thorpe, Sara) [Entered: 02/10/2022 01:22 PM]
February 9, 2022 Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 02/09/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12365850]. [22-55133] (AD) [Entered: 02/09/2022 06:44 PM]
February 9, 2022 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellants Discount Electronics, Inc., Johns Shoe Repair and Optical Connection Entity, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 02/09/2022. [12365834] [22-55133] (Keusseyan, Eileen) [Entered: 02/09/2022 06:15 PM]
February 3, 2022 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Discount Electronics, Inc., Johns Shoe Repair and Optical Connection Entity, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire due on 02/10/2022. Appellants Discount Electronics, Inc., Johns Shoe Repair and Optical Connection Entity, Inc. opening brief due 04/04/2022. Appellee Wesco Insurance Company answering brief due 05/03/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12360161] (JMR) [Entered: 02/03/2022 01:48 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Discount Electronics, Inc., et al v. Wesco Insurance Company, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: DISCOUNT ELECTRONICS, INC., a California Corporation
Represented By: Eileen Keusseyan
Represented By: Natalie Siran Hairabedian Esquire
Represented By: Melkon Melkonian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: JOHNS SHOE REPAIR
Represented By: Eileen Keusseyan
Represented By: Natalie Siran Hairabedian Esquire
Represented By: Melkon Melkonian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: OPTICAL CONNECTION ENTITY, INC., a California Corporation
Represented By: Eileen Keusseyan
Represented By: Natalie Siran Hairabedian Esquire
Represented By: Melkon Melkonian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: WESCO INSURANCE COMPANY
Represented By: Sara M. Thorpe Esquire
Represented By: Kimberly Ann Hartman Esquire
Represented By: Mark J. Sobczak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES, 1 through 50, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?