James Carrow v. John Roberts, Jr., et al
| JAMES H. CARROW and JAMES HALL CARROW |
| JOHN G. ROBERTS, Jr., MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, JANET LOUISE YELLEN, JEROME POWELL, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and UNIDENTIFIED TENANTS OF APTS. 105 AND 110, at 5059 Quail Run Rd., Riverside, CA 92507 and their employers |
| 22-55135 |
| February 3, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Assault, Libel, and Slander |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AT): Appellants February 15, 2022 motions to strike, for a change of venue, and for recusal, and the responses thereto, are referred to the panel assigned to decide the merits of this appeal. The opening brief has been filed. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. [12398469] (WL) [Entered: 03/17/2022 04:45 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellee NFL response opposing motion ([ # 3 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 3 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 3 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 3 ] Motion (ECF Filing)). Date of service: 02/23/2022. [12377650] [22-55135] (Russell, Jason) [Entered: 02/23/2022 11:11 AM] |
| Filing 7 Received 6 paper copies of Opening Brief [ # 2 ] filed by Mr. James Hall Carrow. [12376865] (SD) [Entered: 02/22/2022 04:03 PM] |
| Filing 6 Received 3 paper copies of excerpts of record [ # 4 ] in 1 volume(s) filed by Appellant Mr. James Hall Carrow. [12376283] (KWG) [Entered: 02/22/2022 11:55 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed clerk order: The opening brief [ # 2 ] submitted by Mr. James Hall Carrow is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: not applicable. The excerpts of record [ # 4 ] submitted by Mr. James Hall Carrow are filed. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white covers. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [12371240] (KWG) [Entered: 02/15/2022 03:44 PM] |
| Filing 4 Submitted (ECF) excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellant Mr. James Hall Carrow. Date of service: 02/15/2022. [12370796] [22-55135] (Carrow, James) [Entered: 02/15/2022 11:57 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. James Hall Carrow Motion to strike whole of Final order in lower court, Motion for miscellaneous relief [Motion for a change of venue in the lower court and Motion for recusal], Motion for miscellaneous relief []. Date of service: 02/15/2022. [12370789] [22-55135] (Carrow, James) [Entered: 02/15/2022 11:55 AM] |
| Filing 2 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellant Mr. James Hall Carrow. Date of service: 02/14/2022. [12368719] [22-55135]--[COURT UPDATE: Removed PDF of the motion and excerpts. 02/15/2022 by KWG] (Carrow, James) [Entered: 02/14/2022 02:23 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant James H. Carrow opening brief due 04/04/2022. Appellees Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, National Football League, Jerome Powell, John G. Roberts Jr., Unidentified tenants of Apts. 105 and 110, United States Marshals Service and Janet Louise Yellen answering brief due 05/04/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12360252] (RT) [Entered: 02/03/2022 02:33 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
