Nona Gaprindashvili v. Netflix, Inc., et al
Defendant: DOES, 1 -50
Plaintiff / Appellee: NONA GAPRINDASHVILI
Defendant / Appellant: NETFLIX, INC., a Delaware corporation
Case Number: 22-55143
Filed: February 7, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 4, 2022 Filing 18 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: RSK): Appellants motion to voluntarily dismiss this appeal (Docket Entry No. [ # 17 ]) is granted. Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). The parties shall bear their own costs and attorneys fees on appeal. A copy of this order shall serve as and for the mandate of this court. [12555549] (AF) [Entered: 10/04/2022 11:34 AM]
September 6, 2022 Filing 17 Filed (ECF) Appellant Netflix, Inc. Motion to dismiss case voluntarily pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Date of service: 09/06/2022. [12533863] [22-55143] (Johnson, Arwen) [Entered: 09/06/2022 11:41 AM]
August 29, 2022 Filing 16 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 09/26/2022, Appellant to file a motion or stipulation to dismiss, or contact the circuit mediator. See order for details. [12528591] (VS) [Entered: 08/29/2022 01:37 PM]
August 10, 2022 Filing 15 MEDIATION CONFERENCE RESCHEDULED - Video Conference, 08/23/2022 , 08:00 a.m. Pacific Time. (originally scheduled on 08/12/2022 ). [12514298] (VS) [Entered: 08/10/2022 02:39 PM]
July 29, 2022 Filing 14 Filed order MEDIATION (RSK): A video mediation will be held on August 12, 2022, at 8:00 a.m., Pacific Time. Counsel will receive an email from the Mediation Office in advance with instructions for participating in the conference. (Pacific Standard Time) [12505406] (ABT) [Entered: 07/29/2022 03:06 PM]
July 20, 2022 Filing 13 MEDIATION ORDER FILED -. The briefing schedule previously set by the court is amended as follows : Appellant Netflix, Inc. opening brief due 08/31/2022. Appellee Nona Gaprindashvili answering brief due 09/30/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due within twenty one 21 days from the service date of the answer brief. See order for details. [12498200] (VS) [Entered: 07/20/2022 11:43 AM]
June 10, 2022 Filing 12 MEDIATION STATUS REPORT DUE - 06/17/2022, Counsel for Appellee. See order for details. [12468364] (LW) [Entered: 06/10/2022 11:24 AM]
June 9, 2022 Filing 11 Filed order MEDIATION (RK): The briefing schedule previously set by the court is reset as follows: appellants opening brief is due July 18, 2022; appellee's answering brief is due August 17, 2022; appellants optional reply brief is due within 21 days from the service date of the answering brief. [12467272] (SB) [Entered: 06/09/2022 10:30 AM]
May 26, 2022 Filing 10 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Conference w/ appellant's counsel, 05/26/2022, 1:00 p.m., Pacific Time. See order for details. [12457141] (VS) [Entered: 05/26/2022 11:22 AM]
May 11, 2022 Filing 9 Filed order MEDIATION (RSK): The briefing schedule previously set by the court is amended as follows: appellant's opening brief is due June 17, 2022; appellee's answering brief is due July 18, 2022; appellant's optional reply brief is due within 21 days from the service date of the answering brief. [12444378] (ABT) [Entered: 05/11/2022 02:33 PM]
March 30, 2022 Filing 8 Filed order MEDIATION (RSK): The briefing schedule previously set by the court is amended as follows: appellant's opening brief is due May 18, 2022; appellee's answering brief is due June 17, 2022; appellant's optional reply brief is due within 21 days from the service date of the answering brief. [12408536] (RY) [Entered: 03/30/2022 11:48 AM]
March 22, 2022 Filing 7 Filed order MEDIATION (RK): A video mediation will be held on April 18, 2022, at 8:00 a.m., Pacific Time. Counsel will receive an email from the Mediation Office in advance with instructions for participating in the conference. Unless excused by the Circuit Mediator in advance, each party shall be represented by counsel of record and a client representative having full authority to negotiate and settle the case. Brief, informal, confidential (not served on opposing counsel and not filed with the court) mediation statements should be submitted to Circuit Mediator Robert Kaiser by email (Robert_Kaiser@ca9.uscourts.gov) on or before April 11, 2022. The mediation statements are an opportunity to provide insights into each partys goals and interests, potential impediments to settlement, past settlement discussions, and factors outside the litigation that might impact the parties approaches to settlement. The Circuit Mediator has full access to the appellate and district court dockets, so it is not necessary to repeat legal arguments nor attach copies of pleadings and orders. The mediation statements shall also provide the names and representative capacities of those who will attend the mediation. The confidentiality rules set out in the attached document cover all mediation communication, both oral and written. Counsel must review and provide a copy of the Confidentiality Rules to all mediation participants. Participants should plan to spend the entire day engaged in meaningful settlement discussions. Counsel should review with their clients the information contained in the Mediation Program web site: http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation. [12401428] (WL) [Entered: 03/22/2022 10:19 AM]
March 1, 2022 Filing 6 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN AssessmentConference, 03/14/2022, 10:00 a.m., PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12382766] (VS) [Entered: 03/01/2022 09:54 AM]
February 14, 2022 Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 02/14/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12370189]. [22-55143] (AD) [Entered: 02/14/2022 06:44 PM]
February 14, 2022 Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant Netflix, Inc. Correspondence: Notice of No Transcript Necessary. Date of service: 02/14/2022 [12370031] [22-55143] (Johnson, Arwen) [Entered: 02/14/2022 04:34 PM]
February 14, 2022 Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Netflix, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 02/14/2022. [12369909] [22-55143] (Johnson, Arwen) [Entered: 02/14/2022 03:38 PM]
February 14, 2022 Filing 2 COURT DELETED INCORRECT ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 4 ]. Original Text: Filed (ECF) Appellant Netflix, Inc. Notice of Reporter Default per 9th Circuit Rule 11-1.2. Date of service: 02/14/2022 [12369904] [22-55143] (Johnson, Arwen) [Entered: 02/14/2022 03:37 PM]
February 7, 2022 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Netflix, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire due on 02/14/2022. Appellant Netflix, Inc. opening brief due 04/05/2022. Appellee Nona Gaprindashvili answering brief due 05/05/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12362151] (JMR) [Entered: 02/07/2022 09:48 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Nona Gaprindashvili v. Netflix, Inc., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: NONA GAPRINDASHVILI
Represented By: Rodney Alan Smolla
Represented By: Alexander Rufus-Isaacs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: NETFLIX, INC., a Delaware corporation
Represented By: Arwen R. Johnson
Represented By: Kelly L. Perigoe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES, 1 -50
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?