Athena Cosmetics, Inc. v. AMN Distribution, Inc., et al
| ATHENA COSMETICS, INC., a Delaware corporation |
| AMN DISTRIBUTION, INC., a Delaware corporation and MOISHE NEWMAN, an individual, DBA Brush Express |
| MARINA LOUISE LANG and SOCAL IP LAW GROUP, LLP |
| 22-55159 |
| February 9, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Trademark |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| ATHENA COSMETICS, INC. V. AMN DISTRIBUTION, INC., ET AL |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellants Marina Louise Lang and SoCal IP Law Group, LLP response to Court order dated 02/15/2022. Date of service: 03/08/2022. [12389893] [22-55159] (Lawton, Dan) [Entered: 03/08/2022 06:46 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed order MEDIATION (RSK): This case is NOT SELECTED for inclusion in the Circuit Mediation Program. Counsel may contact Circuit Mediator Robert Kaiser at Robert_Kaiser@ca9.uscourts.gov to discuss services available through the Circuit Mediation Program or to request a settlement assessment conference. Information regarding the mediation program may be found at www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation. [12383091] (AF) [Entered: 03/01/2022 12:43 PM] |
| Filing 4 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 02/16/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12372899]. [22-55159] (AD) [Entered: 02/17/2022 06:44 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Marina Louise Lang Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 02/16/2022. [12372871] [22-55159] (Lawton, Dan) [Entered: 02/16/2022 08:12 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal may not be final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order is not appealable under 1291 unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or judgment is entered in compliance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b)); see also Cunningham v. Hamilton County, 527 U.S. 198, 209-10 (1999); Natl Abortion Fedn v. Ctr. for Med. Progress, 926 F.3d 534, 538-39 (9th Cir. 2019) (civil contempt sanction against non-party attorney not immediately appealable). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellants shall either move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellants elect to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellants do not comply with this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [12370668] (OC) [Entered: 02/15/2022 11:03 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Marina Louise Lang and SoCal IP Law Group, LLP Mediation Questionnaire due on 02/16/2022. Transcript ordered by 03/09/2022. Transcript due 04/08/2022. Appellants Marina Louise Lang and SoCal IP Law Group, LLP opening brief due 05/16/2022. Appellees AMN Distribution, Inc. and Moishe Newman answering brief due 06/16/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12365416] (RT) [Entered: 02/09/2022 02:14 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
